Abstract
I briefly sketch Bohm's causal interpretation (BCI) and its solution to the measurement problem. Crucial to BCI's no-collapse account of both ideal and non-ideal measurement is the existence of particles in addition to wavefunctions. The particles in their role as the producers of the observable experimental outcomes render practical considerations, such as what observables can be reasonably measured or how to get rid of interference terms in non-ideal measurements, secondary to BCI's account of measurement. I then explain why it is not easy for BCI to justify its statistical postulate. To successfully justify the postulate would be to solve the distribution problem. Two proposed deterministic solutions to this problem are only briefly set out and not discussed in detail. BCI can solve the measurement problem whether or not the distribution problem is solved. However, if the distribution problem is not solved, BCI cannot be shown to be empirically adequate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, David: 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Albert, D. Z. and Feinberg, G.: 1993, ,Letter in Response to “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical” by Wojciech Zurek', Physics Today, 10, 36–44. Physics Today, 4, 81.
Barrett, J. A.: 1995, ,The Distribution Postulate in Bohm's Theory', Topoi 14, 45–54.
Belinfante, F. J.: 1973, A Survey of Hidden-Variable Theories. Pergamon Press, New York.
Bell, J. S.: 1990, ,Against “measurement”,, In Arthur I. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, International School of History of Science, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 17–31. NATO Advanced Science Institution Series B: Physics.
Bell, J. S.: 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Bohm, David: 1951, Quantum Theory. Prentice Hall, New York.
Bohm, David: 1952a, ,A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables, Part I', Physical Review 85, 166–179.
Bohm, David: 1952b, ,A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables, Part II', Physical Review 85, 180–193.
Bohm, David: 1953, ,Proof that Probability Density Approaches Ψ2 in Causal Interpretation of the Quantum Theory', Physical Review 89(2), 15.
Bohm, David and Hiley, B. J.: 1989, ,Non-Locality and Locality in the Stochastic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics', Physics Reports (Review Section of Physics Letters) 172(3), 94–122.
Bohm, David and Hiley, B. J.: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, New York.
Bohm, David and Vigier, J. P.: 1954, ,Model of the Causal Interpretation of Quantum Theory in Terms of a Fluid with Irregular Fluctuations', Physical Review 96(1), 208–16.
Boltzmann, Ludwig: 1966, ,Further Studies on the Thermal Equilibrium of Gas Molecules', In Stephen G. Brush (ed.), Kinetic Theory, Volume 2: Irreversible Processes, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, England, pp. 88–175.
Bub, Jeffrey: 1997, Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press, London.
Cushing, James and McMullin, Ernan (eds.): 1989, Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Cushing, James T.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
D'Espagnat, Bernard: 1994, Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghi, Nino: 1992, ,Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty', Journal of Statistical Physics 67(5/6), 843–907.
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghi, Nino: 1995, ,Quantum Physics without Quantum Philosophy', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26B(2), 137–149.
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghi, Nino: 1996, ,Bohmian Mechanics as the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics', In James T. Cushing, Arthur Fine, and Sheldon Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 21–44.
Ehrenfest, Paul and Ehrenfest, Tatiana: 1959, The Conceptual Foundations of the Statistical Approach in Mechanics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Goldstein, Herbert: 1980, Classical Mechanics (2nd edition). Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Holland, Peter R.: 1996, ,Is Quantum Mechanics Universal?', In James T. Cushing, Arthur Fine, and Sheldon Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, pages 99–110, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, 1996.
Peter R. Holland. The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.
J.B. Keller. Bohm's interpretation of quantum theory in terms of ,hidden, variables. Physical Review, 89:1040–1041, 1953.
Tim Maudlin. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.
Yu. V. Shtanov. Origin of quantum randomness in the pilot wave quantum mechanics. CERN Preprint Server, (IUCAA–38/97), 1997.
Lawrence Sklar. Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.
Richard C. Tolman. The Principles of Statistical Mechanics. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1980 (1938).
Valentini, Antony: 1996, ,Pilot-Wave Theory of Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology', In James T. Cushing, Arthur Fine, and Sheldon Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 45–66.
Valentini, Antony: 1991, Signal-Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum H-Theorem I', Physics Letters A 156(1,2), 5–11.
Vink, Jeroen C.: 1993, ,Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Discrete Beables', Physical Review A 48(3), 1808–1818.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subramanyam, J. Measurement and the Justification of the Statistical Postulate in Bohm's Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 113, 423–445 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005061321655
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005061321655