Abstract
The present paper discusses two interesting phenomena concerning phi-features on plural pronouns: (i) plural pronouns that denote atomic individuals (‘dependent plural pronouns’), and (ii) plural pronouns with more than one binder (‘partial binding’). A novel account of these two phenomena is proposed, according to which all occurrences of phi-features are both semantically and morphologically relevant. For such a ‘uniformly semantic account’ of phi-features, dependent plural pronouns constitute a theoretical challenge, while partial binding is more or less straightforwardly accounted for. In order to make sense of the semantic effects of the phi-features on dependent plural pronouns, the following idea is pursued: the phi-features on a dependent plural pronoun reflect the range of values that the pronoun takes, rather than the particular value it denotes at a time. This idea is implemented in a compositional semantics by making use of (Skolemized) choice functions. An appealing feature of the present account is that, unlike its predecessors, it accounts for dependent plural pronouns without c-commanding antecedents in essentially the same way as for those with c-commanding antecedents. It is also shown how this account of dependent plural pronouns can straightforwardly be augmented with set indices to account for partial binding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van den Berg, Martin. 1996. Some Aspects of the Internal Structure of Discourse: The Dynamics of Nominal Anaphora. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Brisson Christine. (2003) Plurals, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(2): 129–184. doi:10.1023/A:1022771705575
Büring Daniel. (2005) Binding Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cable, Seth. 2005. Binding local person pronouns without semantically empty features. Ms., MIT.
Chierchia Gennaro. (1993) Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1: 181–234
Chomsky Noam. (1995) The minimalist program. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge
Cooper, Robin. 1979. The interpretation of pronouns. In Syntax and semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groeningen Round Table, ed. Frank Heny and Helmut Schnelle, 61–92. New York: Academic Press.
Dimitriadis, Alexis. 2000. Beyond identity: Topics in pronominal and reciprocal anaphora. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Elbourne Paul. (2005) Situations and individuals. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1986. Constituent questions: The syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
DonkaHenriëtte de Swart. (2010) The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics & Pragmatics 3: 1–54
Geach Paul. (1962) Reference and generality: An examination of some medieval and modern theories. NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3): 391–428.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim Irene. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2): 137–177
Heim, Irene. 2008. Features on bound pronouns. In Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, ed. Daniel Harbour, David Adger, and Susana Bejar, 35–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heim Irene., Angelika Kratzer. (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford
Higginbotham James. (1983) Logical form, binding, and nominals. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(3): 395–420
Jacobson Pauline. (2000) Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8(2): 77–155
Jacobson Pauline. (2012) The direct compositionality and “uninterpretability”: The case of (sometimes) “uninterpretable” features on pronouns. Journal of Semantics 29(3): 305–343
Kadmon, Nirit. 1987. On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kadmon Nirit. (2001) Formal pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford
Karttunen, Lauri. 1969. Pronouns and variables. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 5, 108–116. Chicago: CLS.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998a. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of SALT 8, 92–109. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Club.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998b. Scope or pseudo-scope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events in grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kratzer Angelika. (2009) Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237
Landman, Fred. 1989. Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 559–605.
Maier, Emar. 2009. Presupposition acquaintance: A unified semantics for de dicto, de re and de se belief reports. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(5): 429–474.
Percus, Orin. 2006. Antipresuppositions. Tech. Rep. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. 15320052.
Reinhart Tanya. (1997) Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–397
Rullmann, Hotze. 2003. Bound-variable pronouns and the semantics of number. In Proceedings of WECOL 2002, ed. Brian Agbayani, Paivi Koskinen, and Vida Samiian, 243–254. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno.
Rullmann Hotze. (2004) First and second person pronouns as bound varibles. Linguistic Inquiry 35(1): 159–168
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 13, ed. Robert B. Young and Yuping Zhou, 258–275. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Club.
Sauerland, Uli. 2008a. On the semantics markedness of phi-features. In Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, ed. Daniel Harbour, David Adger, and Susana Béjar, 57–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sauerland, Uli. 2008b. Pseudo-sloppy readings in flat binding. In Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 7, ed. Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 331–349. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Sorbonne.
Sauerland, Uli. 2013. Presuppositions and the alternative tier. In Todd Snider (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 23, 156–173. Düsseldorf: eLanguage.
Schlenker Philippe. (2003) A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1): 29–120
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. Minimize restrictors! (Notes on definite descriptions, Condition C and epithets.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, ed. Emar Maier, Corien Bary, and Janneke Huitink, 385–416. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.
Schlenker Philippe. (2006) Scopal independence: A note on branching and wide scope readings of indefinites and disjunctions. Journal of Semantics 23(3): 281–314
Schwarzschild Roger. (1994) Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity. Natural Language Semantics 2(3): 201–248. doi:10.1007/BF01256743
Schwarzschild Roger. (1996) Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Spathas, Giorgos. 2010. Focus on anaphora. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In Presuppositions and implicatures in compositional semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, 243–281. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sportiche Dominique. (1985) Remarks on crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 460–469
Stokke, Andreas. 2010. Indexicality and presupposition: explorations beyond truth-conditional information. Ph.D. dissertation, University of St. Andrews.
Sudo, Yasutada. 2012. On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Sudo, Yasutada. 2013. Person features are not presupposition triggers. Ms., UCL.
Winter Yoad. (1997) Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467
Winter Yoad. (2001) Flexibility principles in Boolean semantics: The interpretation of coordination, plurality, and scope in natural language. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge
Winter Yoad. (2002) Atoms and sets: A characterization of semantic number. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3): 493–505
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Sudo, Y. Dependent plural pronouns with Skolemized choice functions. Nat Lang Semantics 22, 265–297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-014-9107-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-014-9107-3