Abstract
This article considers the difficult question of whether there are any reasons for theocratic religious devotees to affirm liberalism and liberal institutions. Swaine argues not only that there are reasons for theocrats to affirm liberalism, but that theocrats are committed rationally to three normative principles of liberty of conscience, as well. Swaine subsequently discusses three institutional and strategic implications of his arguments. First, he outlines an option of semisovereignty for theocratic communities in liberal democracies, and explains why an appropriate valuation of liberty of conscience may justify a standard of that kind. Second, he addresses the question of permissible government aid for religion and symbolic endorsement of religious groups. Third, Swaine considers innovations and new approaches that could be employed internationally to better display liberal government's affirmation of religiosity, to promote liberty of conscience, and to help improve relations between liberal and theocratic parties around the globe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adanir, F., Religious Communities and Ethnic Groups Under Imperial Sway: Ottoman and Habsburg Lands in Comparison. Unpublished paper, 2001.
Aquinas, in P. Sigmund (ed.) and tr., St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1988.
Audi, R., Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bader, V., Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy? Political Theory 27(5) (1999), pp. 597–633.
Bader, V., Introduction, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6(1) (2003), pp. 3–22.
Carter, L.F., Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram: The Role of Shared Values in the Creation of a Community. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Childress, J., Appeals to Conscience, Ethics 89(4) (1979), pp. 315–335.
Cover, R., The Supreme Court 1982 Term Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, Harvard Law Review 97 (1983), pp. 4–68.
Curran, C.E., Directions in Fundamental Moral Theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1985.
D'Arcy, E., Conscience and Its Right to Freedom. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1961.
Eldridge, L.D., A Distant Heritage: The Growth of Free Speech in Early America. New York: New York University Press, 1994.
Finnis, J., Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Galston, W.A., Two Concepts of Liberalism, Ethics 105 (1995), pp. 516–534.
Galston, W.A., Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Gaustad, E., Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in America. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1991.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., The Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions, in R.I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.), Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Hostetler, J., Amish Society, 4th Ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Korsgaard, C.M., The Normativity of Instrumental Reason, in G. Cullity and B. Gaut (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Kraybill, D.B., The Riddle of Amish Culture, revised Ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Kukathas, C., Are There Any Cultural Rights? Political Theory 20 (1992a), pp. 105–139.
Kukathas, C., Cultural Rights Again: A Rejoinder to Kymlicka, Political Theory 20 (1992b), pp. 674–680.
Kukathas, C., Cultural Toleration, in I. Shapiro and W. Kymlicka (eds.), NOMOS XXXIX: Ethnicity and Group Rights. New York: New York University Press, 1997, pp. 69–104.
Kymlicka, W., Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Kymlicka, W., Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance, in D. Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Larmore, C., The Morals of Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Madison, J., Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, in The Papers of James Madison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962 [1785].
McConnell, M.W., Accommodation of Religion: An Update and a Response to the Critics, George Washington Law Review 60 (1992), pp. 685–742.
McConnell, M.W., Old Liberalism, New Liberalism, and People of Faith, in M.W. McConnell, R.F. Cochran, Jr. and A.G. Carmella (eds.), Christian Perspectives on Legal Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001, pp. 5–24.
McConnell, M.W., and Posner, R., An Economic Approach to Issues of Religious Freedom, University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), pp. 1–60.
McGuire, M., On Conscience, Journal of Philosophy, 60 (1963), pp. 253–263.
Mill, J.S., in John Gray (ed.), On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991 [1859].
Millas, H., Non-Muslim Minorities in the Historiography of Republican Turkey: The Greek Case, in S. Faroqhi and F. Adanir (eds.), The Ottomans and the Balkans: A Discussion of Historiography. Boston: Brill, 2002, pp. 155–191.
Nozick, R., The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
Pandey, T.N., Patterns of Leadership in Western Pueblo Society, in R. DeMallie and A. Ortiz (eds.), North American Indian Anthropology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994, pp. 328–339.
Pierce, C.H., Conscience in the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1955.
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism, paperback Ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Redekopp, C. Mennonite Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
Resnik, J., Dependent Sovereigns: Indian Tribes, States, and the Federal Courts, University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), pp. 671–759.
Rosen, M.D., The Outer Limits of Community Self-Governance in Residential Associations, Municipalities, and Indian Country: A Liberal Theory, Virginia Law Review 84(6) (1998), pp. 1053–1144.
Rosen, M.D., Our Nonuniform Constitution: Geographical Variations of Constitutional Requirements in the Aid of Community, Texas Law Review 77(5) (1999), pp. 1129–1194.
Rosen, M.D., The Radical Possibility of Limited Community-Based Interpretation of the Constitution, William and Mary Law Review 43(3) (2002), pp. 927–1010.
Rosenblum, N.L., Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Shue, H., Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.
Sperow, J.L., Rajneeshpuram: Religion Incorporated, Hastings Law Journal 30 (1985), pp. 917–968.
Swaine, L.A., Principled Separation: Liberal Governance and Religious Free Exercise, Journal of Church and State 38(3) (1996), pp. 595–619.
Swaine, L.A., How Ought Liberal Democracies to Treat Theocratic Communities? Ethics 111(1) (2001), pp. 302–343.
Weisbrod, C., Family, Church and State. Legal History Program Working Paper #2. Madison: Institute for Legal Studies, 1985.
Wilkinson, C.F., Civil Liberties Guarantees When Indian Tribes Act as Majority Societies: The Case of the Winnebago Retrocession, Creighton Law Review 21 (1988), pp. 773–799.
Williams, R., The Bloudy Tenet of Persecution, for Cause of Conscience, 1644.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swaine, L.A. Institutions of Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6, 93–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023276401190
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023276401190