Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ``Evolutionary Synthesis'' of George Udny Yule

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the work ofGeorge Udny Yule in relation to theevolutionary synthesis and thebiometric-Mendelian debate. It has generallybeen claimed that (i.) in 1902, Yule put forththe first account showing that the competingbiometric and Mendelian programs could besynthesized. Furthermore, (ii.) the scientificfigures who should have been most interested inthis thesis (the biometricians W. F. RaphaelWeldon and Karl Pearson, and the MendelianWilliam Bateson) were too blinded by personalanimosity towards each other to appreciateYule's proposal. This essay provides adetailed account of (i.), maintaining thatYule's 1902 proposal is better understood as areduction, not a synthesis of the two programs.The results of this analysis are then used toevaluate (ii.), where I will instead argue thatBateson and the biometricians had good reasonsto avoid endorsing Yule's account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ankeny, Rachel. A. 2000. “Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A.D. Darbishire to Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 33: 315-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson,William. 1886. “The Ancestry of the Chordates.” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 26: 539-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation, with Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 51: 605.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1901. “Experiments in Plant Hybridization.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1902a. “The Facts of Heredity in the Light of Mendel's Discovery.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1902b. “Note on the Resolution of Compound Characters by Cross-Breeding.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1902c. Mendel's Principles of Heredity, a Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press — 1909. Mendel's Principles of Heredity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923. “Genetics of Primula Sinensis.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.H. 1983. Natural Selection, Heredity, and Eugenics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock, A.G. 1973. “William Bateson, Mendelism, and Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, Lindley. 1977. “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, Edward. 1910. “A Mendelian Interpretation of Variation That is Apparently Continuous.” American Naturalist 44: 65-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. 1902. The New Phytologist 1: 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Raphael. 1991. “The Dominance of Traits in Genetic Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology 24: 457-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, Lyndsay. 1975. “Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study-The English Biometric School and Mendel's Laws.” Social Studies of Science 5: 269-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald A. 1918. “The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 399-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froggatt, P. and Nevin, N.C. 1971. “The 'Law of Ancestral Heredity' and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England, 1889-1906.” Journal of Medical Genetics 8: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. 1897. “The Average Contribution of Each Several Ancestor to the Total Heritage of the Offspring.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 61: 401-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1889. Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David. 1985. “Darwinism as a Historical Entity: A Historiographic Proposal.” David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 773-812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen, Wilhelm L. 1903. “Concerning Heredity in Populations and in Pure Lines.” Selected Readings in Biology for Natural Sciencesv3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, Maurice G. 1971. Statistical Papers of George Udny Yule. London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel. 1981. “Genetics in the United States and Great Britain 1890-1930: A Review with Speculations.” C. Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine, and Society 1840-1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Kyung-Man. 1994. Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Donald. 1981. “Sociobiologists in Competition: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” C. Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine, and Society 1840-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Donald and Barnes, Barry. 1974. “Historical and Sociological Analyses of Scientific Change: The Case of the Mendelian-Biometrician Controversy in England.” Unpublished Manuscript.

  • — 1979. “Scientific Judgement: The Biometrician-Mendelism Controversy.” B. Barnes and S. Shapin (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Change, London: Sage, pp. 191-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1941. “Variation and Selection of Polygenic Characters.” Journal of Genetics 41: 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1973. “The Recent Historiography of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 125-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Margaret. 2002. “Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 39-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson-Ehle, Nils Hermann. 1909. “Kreuzungsuntersuchungen an Hafer und Weizen.” Lunds Univ. Årsskrift n.s., series 2, 5(2): 1-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.J. 1973. “The Biometric Defense of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 283-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1975. “Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 8: 85-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert. 1988. “The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate.” British Journal for the History of Science 22: 299-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Karl. 1900. The Grammar of Science, 2nd ed. London: A. and C. Black Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1903. “The Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 211-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1904. “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XII. On a Generalised Theory of Alternative Inheritance, with Special Reference to Mendel's Laws.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 203: 53-86.

  • — 1907. “On the Theory of Inheritance of Quantitative Compound Characters on the Basis of Mendel's Laws, by G.U. Yule: A Review.” Biometrika 5: 481-482.

  • Provine, William B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 2001. “Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900-1910.” Isis 22: 55-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1980. “The Controversy between Biometricians and Mendelians: A Test Case for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Science Information 19: 501-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, Sahotra. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, Dudley. 1980. “The Meaning of the Evolutionary Synthesis.” The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistleton-Dyer, SirWilliam Turner. 1895. “Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 52: 3, 78, 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, W. F. Raphael. 1890. “The Variations Occurring in Certain Decapod Crustacea I. Crangon vulgaris.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 47: 445-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1892. “Certain Correlated Variations in Crangon vulgaris.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 51: 2-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1894. “The Study of Animal Variation, a Review.” Nature 50: 25-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 52: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1902. “Mendel's Laws of Alternative Inheritance in Peas.” Biometrika 1: 228-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall. 1978. “The Relation of Livestock Breeding to Theories of Evolution.” Journal of Animal Science 46: 1192-1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, George U. 1902. “Mendel's Laws and Their Probable Relations to Intra-Racial Heredity.” The New Phytologist 1: 193-207, 222-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • —1906. “On the Theory of Inheritance of Quantitative Compound Characters on the Basis ofMendel's Laws-A Preliminary Note.” Report of the Conference on Genetics: 140-142.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    James G. Tabery

Authors
  1. James G. Tabery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabery, J.G. The ``Evolutionary Synthesis'' of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology 37, 73–101 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac

Search

Navigation