Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minds, programs, and Chinese philosophers: A Chinese perspective on the Chinese room

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is concerned with John Searle’s famous Chinese room argument. Despite being objected to by some, Searle’s Chinese room argument appears very appealing. This is because Searle’s argument is based on an intuition about the mind that ‘we’ all seem to share. Ironically, however, Chinese philosophers don’t seem to share this same intuition. The paper begins by first analysing Searle’s Chinee room argument. It then introduces what can be seen as the (implicit) Chinese view of the mind. Lastly, it demonstrates a conceptual difference between Chinese and Western philosophy with respect to the notion of mind. Thus, it is shown that one must carefully attend to the presuppositions underlying Chinese philosophising in interpreting Chinese philosophers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Copeland, J. (1993)Artificial Intelligence—A Philosophical Introduction, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. (1989)Disputers of the TAO, Open Court, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.L. and R.T. Ames (1987)Thinking Through Confucius, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.L. and R.T. Ames (1995)Anticipating China, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. (1983)Language and Logic in Ancient China, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. (1992)A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., S. Stich and J.M. Weinberg (forthcoming) ‘Metaskepticism: Meditations in Ethno-Epistemology’.

  • Rosemont, H. Jr. (1991)A Chinese Mirror, Open Court, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1980) ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, J.M., S. Nichols and S. Stich (forthcoming) ‘Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions’,Philosophical Topics.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Koji Tanaka

Authors
  1. Koji Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Tanaka.

Additional information

The first draft of this essay was written as a record of the thought which struck me in midst of delivering a lecture on the Chinese view of the mind. I would like to thank Jay Garfield for suggesting me to write a paper based on the record. Many thanks also go to Tim Bayne for his comments on earlier drafts of the paper which led to many improvements. I have also greatly benefited from the comments of the anonymous referees solicited for this journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, K. Minds, programs, and Chinese philosophers: A Chinese perspective on the Chinese room. SOPHIA 43, 61–72 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782437

Keywords

Search

Navigation