Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Ted Peters’ “Models of God”

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “Models of God,” Ted Peters discusses a methodology for formulating and evaluating models of God, surveys nine models, and proposes one that he entitles “Eschatological Panentheism.” This paper provides critical comments on Peters’ methodological claims, taxonomy of models of God, and specific proposal. This paper has been delivered during APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.Both Peters’ “Models of God” and these comments were presented at the “Models of God” mini-conference at the Pacific Division Meetings of the American Philosophical Association in April of 2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, J.E. Response to Ted Peters’ “Models of God”. Philosophia 35, 289–292 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9064-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9064-x

Keywords

Navigation