Skip to main content

The New Atheism and Models of God: The Case of Richard Dawkins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities

Abstract

Richard Dawkins is the only New Atheist who provides an explicit model of God. According to his “God Hypothesis,” which he argues is “very nearly false,” “there exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and created the universe and everything in it, including us.” But his argument is inadequate against traditional monotheism, since the monotheist model the God Hypothesis entails omits important elements of classical monotheist models of God. In particular, Dawkins’ assumption that God would have to be complex in such a way as to need to have been designed is questionable from the standpoint of perfect being theology. Moreover, his argument does not even exclude an imperfect monotheist god, since each of its premises is doubtful. Furthermore, even if his argument succeeded against these two varieties of monotheism, it would fail to rule out divine realities described by non-monotheist models of God such as pantheism and panentheism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alvin Plantinga makes this point in his 2007 review of The God Delusion.

  2. 2.

    Plantinga also mentions this in 2007, p. 3.

  3. 3.

    Bill Craig makes this sort of point in his reply to Dawkins (2009, pp. 2–5).

  4. 4.

    See Monadology, paragraph 58.

References

  • Copan, Paul, and William Lane Craig (eds.). 2009. Contending with Christianity’s critics: Answering new atheists and other objectors. Nashville: Broadman & Holman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 2006. Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Sam. 2004. The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Sam. 2008. Letter to a Christian nation. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, Christopher. 2007. God is not great: How religion poisons everything. New York: Twelve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin. 2007. The Dawkins confusion: Naturalism ‘ad absurdum.’ Books & Culture website. http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2007/marapr/1.21.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.E. (2013). The New Atheism and Models of God: The Case of Richard Dawkins. In: Diller, J., Kasher, A. (eds) Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_60

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics