Skip to main content
Log in

Pragmatism and Feminism as Qualified Relativism

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores pragmatism's associationwith relativism, not to rescue it fromrelativism but rather to highlight how aspectsof the classic pragmatists' positions supportqualified relativism. I do so in an effort tohelp restore ``relativism'' as a meaningfulconcept that is nuanced and complex, ratherthan naive and vulgar, as it is regularlyportrayed by more traditional philosophers. This nuanced relativism I call qualifiedrelativism. Qualified relativists insist thatall inquiry are affected by philosophicalassumptions which are culturally bound, andthat all inquirers are situated knowers who areculturally bound as well. However, we cancompensate for our cultural embeddedness byopening our horizons and including others inour conversations. I connect the classicpragmatist points to current feministepistemological work and show that qualifiedrelativists (pragmatists, feminists, andpostmodernists) can claim roots to theirpositions in Peirce, James, and Dewey, some ofthe very scholars others turn to for theirpragmatic realism and their nonvulgar absolutism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • AnzaldÚa, G. (Ed) (1990). Making face, making soul: Haciendo caras. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • AnzaldÚa, G. & Moraga, C. (Eds) (1981, 1983). This bridge called my back. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15-48). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. (1916, 1966). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925, 1981). Experience and nature. In J. Boydston (Ed), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953, Vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925, 1981). Experience and philosophical method. In J. Boydston (Ed), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953, Vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1983). Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphysics. In S. Harding & M.B. Hintikka (Eds), Discovering reality (pp. 245-281). Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (Ed) (1995). The new scholarship on Dewey. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and tocial feminism. In L.J. Nicholson (Ed), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 190-233). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49-82). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From the margin to the center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (1997). Logical principles and philosophical attitudes: Peirce's response to James's pragmatism. In R.A. Putnam (Ed), The Cambridge companion to William James (pp. 145-165). Cambridge, UK: Cambrdige University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907, 1975a). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909, 1975b). The meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James,W. (1909, 1977). A pluralistic universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1912, 1976). Essays in radical empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1993). Subjects, power and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 101-120). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In Sister outsider. Freedom, CA: Crossing. Reprinted in Moraga, C. & AnzaldÚa, G. (Eds) (1981, 1983). This bridge called my back (pp. 98-101). New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, 'world' traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia, 2, 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. (1997). When you know it, and I know it, what is it we know? Pragmatic realism and the epistemological absolute. In F. Margonis (Ed), Philosophy of education 1996 (pp. 21-29). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. & Sears, E. (2000). Deweyan pragmatism and the quest for true Belief. Educational Theory, 50(2), 213-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L.H. (Spring 1993). A question of evidence. Hypatia, 8(2), 172-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. (1993). Epistemological communities. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 121-159). New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1933-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshone & P.Weiss (Eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1958). Values in an Universe of chance: Selected writings of Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914). In P.P. Wiener (Ed). Garden City, NJ: Doubleday & Co, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigfried, C.H. (1990). William James's radical reconstruction of philosophy. Albany,NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigfried, C.H. (1996). Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism refuted: A critique of contemporary epistemological relativism. Dordrecht & Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1997). Rationality redeemed? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeper, R.W. (1986). The necessity of pragmatism: John Dewey's conception of philosophy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2000). Caring reasoning, Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Curriculum, 19(4), 22-34.

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2001). Radical democratic communities always-in-the-making. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(1), 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2002). A feminist re/examination of William James as a qualified relativist. In E. Bredo, J. Garrison & R. Podeschi (Eds), William James and education (pp. 97-114). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2003). Relational “(e)pistemologies.” New York: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1989). The American evasion of philosophy: A genealogy of pragmatism. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thayer-Bacon, B. Pragmatism and Feminism as Qualified Relativism. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22, 417–438 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025735417682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025735417682

Navigation