Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Private standards, grower networks, and power in a food supply system

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of private food standards in agriculture is increasingly raising questions of legitimacy, particularly in light of the impacts such standards may have on food producers. While much work has been carried out at a macro policy level for developing countries, there have been relatively few empirical case studies that focus on particular food supply chains, and even fewer studies still of the impact of private standards on developed countries such as Australia. This study seeks to address this imbalance, with a particular focus on examining the impact of private standards on an Australian vegetable supply food system in North Tasmania as well as tracing the impact of perceived and actual power relations among actors. Applying a governance framework and adopting a Foucauldian position we show that private standards are a “technology of power” that have risen out of a crisis discourse in the mid-1990s about on-farm food safety. Private standards have the effect of using knowledge from particular actors to establish truths about good agricultural practice (GAP), however we show that Tasmanian vegetable growers are not docile bodies and are employing alternative knowledge and technologies of power to challenge how GAP is implemented on-farm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GlobalGAP:

Global good agricultural practice standard

QA:

Quality assurance

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2006. Australian Census 2006: Burnie-Devonport Region. 2006. Australian Government. http://www.abs.gov.au. Accessed 29 Nov 2010.

  • Barndt, D. 1997. Bio/cultural diversity and equity in post-NAFTA Mexico (Or: Tomasita comes North while Big Mac goes South). In Global justice, global democracy, ed. J. Drydyk, and P. Penz, 55–69. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. 2005. The rise and rise of EurepGAP: European (re)invention of colonial food relations? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 13(2): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, G., T. Schirato, and J. Webb. 2000. Understanding Foucault. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, N. 2011. Coles and Woolies in false fruit labelling pickle. Australian Food News, May. http://www.ausfoodnews.com.au/2011/05/13/coles-and-woolies-in-false-fruit-labelling-pickle.html. Accessed 1 Sep 2012.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. In ed, Gordon, C. New York: Pantheon Press.

  • FSANZ. 2011. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/. Accessed 9 Jan 2011.

  • Fuchs, D., A. Kalfagianni, J. Clapp, and L. Busch. 2011a. Introduction to symposium on private agrifood governance: Values, shortcomings, and strategies. Agriculture and Human Values 28(3): 335–344. doi:10.1007/s10460-011-9310-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., A. Kalfagianni, and T. Havinga. 2011b. Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values 28(3): 353–367. doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9236-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GlobalGAP. 2010. GLOBALG.A.P. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idcat=9. Accessed 1 Dec 2010.

  • Hatanaka, M., C. Bain, and L. Busch. 2005. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy 30(3): 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M.K., and W.D. Heffernan. 2002. Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis 42(4): 347–369. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M., J. Wilkinson, W.D. Heffernan, and R. Gronski. 2008. The global food system and nodes of power. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337273. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337273.

  • Henson, S. 2011. Private agrifood governance: Conclusions, observations, and provocations. Agriculture and Human Values 28(3): 443–451. doi:10.1007/s10460-011-9309-y.

  • Henson, S., O. Masakure, and D. Boselie. 2005. Private food safety and quality standards for fresh produce exporters: The case of Hortico Agrisystems, Zimbabwe. Food Policy 30(4): 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., J. Dibden, and C. Cocklin. 2008a. Building alternative agri-food networks: Certification, embeddedness, and agri-environmental governance. Journal of Rural Studies 24(1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., J. Dibden, and C. Cocklin. 2008b. Neoliberalism and natural resource management: Agri-environmental standards and the governing of farming practices. Geoforum 39(5): 1776–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., and G. Lawrence. eds. 2005. Introduction: Globalization and agricultural governance. In Agricultural governance: Globalization and the new politics of regulation. New York: Routledge.

  • Lee, G.C.-H. 2006. Private food standards and their impacts on developing countries. Stagiaire: European Commission, DG Trade Unit G2.

  • Lockie, S. 2006. Networks of agri-environmental action: Temporality, spatiality, and identity in agricultural environments. Sociologia Ruralis 46(1): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. 1998. Environmental and social risks, and the construction of “best-practice” in Australian agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 15: 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., and J. Pietsch. 2012. Public opinion on food security. In Unpublished report. Canberra: Australian National University, College of Arts and Social Sciences.

  • Lockie, S., and V. Higgins. 2007. Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. 2009a. A food regime analysis of the “world food crisis”. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. 2009b. A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. 2008. Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please. Journal of Agrarian Change 8(2–3): 205–228. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholliers, P. 2008. Defining food risks and food anxieties throughout history. Appetite 51: 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 2009. Social network analysis. A handbook. 2/e. London: SAGE.

  • Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50(155): 17–28. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennent, R., and S. Lockie. 2012. Production relations under GlobalGAP: The relative influence of standards and retail market structure. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1): 31–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00555.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks must go to the Tasmanian growers, processors, packers, chemical and fertilizer suppliers, extension agents and consultants who gave generously of their time, experience, and expertise. We thank also the reviewers of this article who made valuable comments. This project was supported with funding from the Australian Research Council (Project No. DP988895).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyndal-Joy Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, LJ., Lockie, S. Private standards, grower networks, and power in a food supply system. Agric Hum Values 30, 379–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9404-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9404-8

Keywords

Navigation