Abstract
In recent years a number of writers have defended and attacked various features of structural, or neo-realist theories of international politics. Few, however, have quarrelled with one of the most foundational features of neorealist theory: its assumptions about the nature of science and scientific theories. In this essay I assess the views of science underlying much neorealist theory, especially as they are articulated in the work of Kenneth Waltz. I argue not only that neorealist theories rest on assumptions about science and theory that have been questioned by postpositivist philosophers and historians of science, but also that the failure to consider the work of these writers yields theories of international politics that are deficient in several respects: they are “weak” theories in the sense that they cannot illuminate crucial features of international politics, they presuppose and sustain a narrow view of power and power relations, they reify practices and relations in the international arena and they offer little promise of producing the sort of “Copernican Revolution” for which Waltz called (or, more modestly, even a minimally satisfactory theory of international politics). In light of these shortcomings, I sketch an alternative approach to the study of international affairs, one that has been termed “prototype studies.” I contend that such an approach provides scholars with a rigorous way of studying international politics, without being a theoretical science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashley, Richard. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38(Spring): 225-286.
Barnes, Barry. (1977). Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Barnes, Barry and David Bloor. (1982). Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge. In Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bhaskar, Roy. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton, Sussex: Harvestor Press.
Bhaskar, Roy. (1986). Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
Blank, Stephen. (1978). The Politics of Foreign Economic Policy, the Domestic Economy, and the Problem of Pluralist Stagnation. In Peter J. Katzenstein (Ed.), Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison,WI.: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bloor, David. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bloor, David. (1981). The Strengths of the Strong Programme. Philosophy of the Social Sciences11 (June): 199-213.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1985). The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theory and Society 14(November): 723-744.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory 7(Spring): 14-25.
Buzan, Barry and R.J. Barry Jones (Eds.). (1981). Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. London: Frances Pinter Publishers.
Crick, Bernard. (1521/1970). Introduction. In Niccolò Machiavelli, TheDiscourses. NewYork: Viking Penguin.
Davidson, Donald. (1982). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1980). Holism and Hermeneutics. Review of Metaphysics 34(September): 3-23.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1986). Why Studies of Human Capacities Modeled on Ideal Natural Science Can Never Achieve Their Goal. In J. Margolis, M. Krausz, and R.M. Burian (Eds.), Rationality, Relativism and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabinow. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feshbach, Murral and Alfred Friendly, Jr. (1992). Ecocide in the USSR: Health and Nature Under Siege. New York: Basic Books.
Feyerabend, Paul. (1975). Against Method. London: Verso.
Foucault, Michel. (1979). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. (1980). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. (1983). The Subject and Power. In Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garst, Daniel. (1984). Thucydides and Political Realism. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meeting in Washington, DC.
Gilpin, Robert. (1975). U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, Robert. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization 38(Spring): 287-304.
Gombrich, Ernst H. (1969). Art and Illusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greybeal, Jean. (1990). Language and the “Feminine” in Nietzsche and Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hacking, Ian. (1983). Representing and Intervening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, Norwood Russell. (1965). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartz, Louis. (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Hesse, Mary. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.
Hoffman, Stanley. (1978). Primacy or World Order. New York: McGraw Hill.
Holsti, Ole, Randolph Siverson, and Alexander L. George (Eds.). (1980). Change in the International System. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Irigaray, Luce. (1991). Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. (1797/1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper and Row.
Kaplan, Morton. (1979). Towards Professionalismin International Theory. New York: Macmillan.
Keohane, Robert. (1984). Beyond Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. (1986). Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond. In Robert O. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Krasner, Stephen. (1978). Defending the National Interest. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. (1984). Errors Have Their Advantage. International Organization 38(Spring): 305-320.
Kuhn, Thomas. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lake, David. (1983). International Economic Structures and American Foreign Policy, 1887- 1934. World Politics 34(July): 517-543.
Lake, David. (1984). Beneath the Commerce of Nations: A Theory of International Economic Structures. International Studies Quarterly 28(June): 141-168.
Machiavelli, Niccolò. (1532/1950). The Prince and the Discourses. New York: Modern Library.
Mill, John Stuart. (1872/1988). The Logic of the Moral Sciences. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.
Mulkay, Michael. (1979). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1886/1966). Beyond Good and Evil. New York: Vintage.
Patton, Paul, (Ed). (1993). Nietzsche, Feminism, and Political Theory. New York: Routledge.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. (1984). Fortune Is a Woman. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Popper, Karl. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Torchbook.
Ricoeur, Paul. (1974). Structure, Word, Event. In Paul Ricoeur, The Conflict of Interpretations. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Rorty, Richard. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, Richard. (1980). A Reply to Dreyfus and Taylor. Review of Metaphysics 34(September): 39-46.
Rorty, Richard. (1982). Method, Social Science, and Social Hope. In Richard Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rorty, Richard. (1988). Is Natural Science a Natural Kind? In Ernan McMullin (Ed.), Construction and Constraint. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Rosecrance, Richard. (1981). International Theory Revisited. International Organization 35(Autumn): 691-714.
Ruggie, John. (1980). Review: Defending the National Interestby Stephen Krasner. American Political Science Review 74(March): 298.
Ruggie, John. (1984). Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. World Politics 35(Spring): 261-285.
Runciman, William. (1978). What is Structuralism? In Alan Ryan (Ed.), The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1981). Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1982). The Apotheosis of Captain Cook. In Michel Izard and Pierre Smith (Eds.), Between Belief and Transgression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Searle, John. (1984). Minds, Brains, and Science. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Shapin, Steven. (1982). The History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction. History of Science 20(September): 157-211.
Symposium. (1994). Is Russian Democracy Doomed? Journal of Democracy 5(April): 3-41.
Taylor, Charles. (1979). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. In Paul Rabinow and William Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Topper, Keith. (1994). Sciences of Uncertainty: Perspectives on Naturalism, Politics and Power. Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles.
Vico, Giambattista. (1725/1961). The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.
Waltz, Kenneth. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley.
Waltz, Kenneth. (1986). Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics. In Robert O. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Topper, K. The Theory of International Politics? An Analysis of Neorealist Theory. Human Studies 21, 157–186 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005347603731
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005347603731