Abstract
The modern idea of causality, dominant since the seventeenth century, contrasts sharply with the earlier acceptation of the termcause (causa, aitia)in the Aristotelian tradition. While the Aristotelian physicist sought for the causes ofthings, and admitted as such anything, be it stuffs or structures, drives or goals, that might reasonably account for the object under study, the modern scientist inquires after the causes ofprocessesorstates of affairs, meaning the agents that bring them about. This drastic change in the sense and scope of one of the fundamental categories of scientific thought has often been said to stem from a change of purpose: modern science, it is said, pursues the domination, not the contemplation of nature. With such an end in mind, the scientist would tend of course to ignore nature’s own ends — if indeed it has any — and to view each natural stuff as nothing but an aggregate of passive and active dispositions to aid or resist man’s aims. However, though the prospective “master and lord of nature”1might thus free himself from the Aristotelian preoccupation with the so-called final and material causes, it is unlikely that he could direct all his attention to “sources of change”(arkhai tes metaboles)or efficient causes, in utter disregard of form or structure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birkhoff, G. D. 1923.Relativity and Modern Physics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Descartes, R.(AT), Oeuvres. Edited by C. Adam and P. Tannery. 12 vols. Paris: Cerf, 1897–1910.
Ducasse, C. J. 1926. ‘On the Nature and the Observability of the Causal Relation,’Journal of Philosophy23: reprinted in Ducasse,Truth, Knowledge and Causation, pp. 1–14. London: Routledge, 1968.
Earman, J. 1972. ‘Notes on the Causal Theory of Time,’Synthese 24, 74–86.
Ehlers, J., F. A. E. Pirani and A. Schild. 1972. The Geometry of Free Fall and Light Propagation.’ In O’Raifeartaigh (ed.),General Relativity. Papers in Honour of J. L. Synge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Einstein, A. 1905. ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,’Annalen der Physik(4) 17, 891–921.
Einstein, A. 1917, ‘Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,’ Sitzungsberichte d. Preuss.Akad.der Wiss., pp. 142–152.
Einstein, A. 1918. ‘Ueber Gravitationswellen,’ Sitzungsber. d. Preuss.Akad.der Wiss., pp. 154–167.
Einstein, A. 1956.The Meaning of Relativity. 5th ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Einstein, A. and M. Grossmann. 1913.Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitatstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation. Leipzig: Teubner.
Fraassen, B. C. van. 1972. ‘Earman on the Causal Theory of Time,’Synthese 24, 87–95.
Friedmann, A. 1922. ‘Ueber die Krümmung des Raumes,’Zeitschrift für Physik 10, 377–386.
Friedmann, A. 1924. ‘Ueber die Möglichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer Krümmung des Raumes,’Zeitschrift für Physik 21, 326–332.
Grünbaum, A. 1957. ‘The Philosophical Retention of Absolute Space in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity,’Philosophical Review 66, 525 - 534.
Grünbaum, A. 1973.Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd enlarged edition.Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hawking, S. W. and G. F. R. Ellis. 1973.The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: The University Press.
Hawking, S. W., A. King, and P. McCarthy. 1976. ‘A New Topology for Curved Space- Time which Incorporates the Causal, Differential and Conformal Structures,’Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 174–181.
Hume, D. 1888.A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Laue, M. Von. 1911. ‘Zur Dynamik der Relativitatstheorie,’Annalen der Physik(4)35, 524–542.
Laue, M. von. 1920. ‘Theoretisches über neuere optische Beobachtungen zur Relativitätstheorie,’Physikalische Zeitschrift 21, 659–662.
MacCallum, M. A. H. 1971. ‘Mixmaster Universe Problem,’Nature, Phys. Sci.230, 112–113.
Malament, D. 1977. ‘The Class of Continuous Timelike Curves Determines the Topology of Spacetime,’Journal of Mathematical Physics18, 1399–1404.
Mehlberg, H. 1935/1937. ‘Essai sur la theorie causale du temps,’Studia philosophica(Lemberg),1, 119–260;2, 111-231. See also Mehlberg (1980).
Mehlberg, H. 1935/1937. ‘Essai sur la theorie causale du temps,’Studia philosophica(Lemberg),1, 119–260;2, 111-231. See also Mehlberg (1980).
Mehlberg, H. 1980.Essay on the Causal Theory of Time. (Vol. I ofTime, Causality and the Quantum Theory. Ed. by R. S. Cohen 2 vols.)Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 19. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel. Translation of Mehlberg (1935/ 1937 ).
Minkowski, H. 1909. ‘Raum und Zeit,’Physikalische Zeitschrift 10, 104–111.
Newton, I. 1962.Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Edited by A. R. and M. B. Hall. Cambridge: The University Press.
Newton, I. 1972.Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. Ed. by A. Koyre and I. B. Cohen. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Petrov, A. Z. 1969.Einstein Spaces. Oxford: Pergamon.
Pieri, M. 1899. Delia geometria elementare come sistemaipotetico-deduttivo;monografia del puntoe del moto? Memorie della R.Acad, delle Scienze di Torino, Cl.Sc.Fis.Mat.e Nat. (2)49, 173–222.
Reichenbach, H. 1928.Philosophic der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Berlin: W.de Gruyter. See also Reichenbach (1958).
Reichenbach, H. 1958.The Philosophy of Space and Time. Transl. by M. Reichenbach and J. Freund. New York: Dover. Translation of Reichenbach (1928).
Rindler, W. 1956. ‘Visual Horizons in World Models,’Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 116, 662 — 677.
Rindler, W. 1977.Essential Relativity, Special, General and Cosmological. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Robb, A. A. 1914.,A Theory of Time and Space. Cambridge: The University Press.
Schwarzschild, K. 1916. ‘Ueber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,’ Sitzungsber. d. Preuss. Akad. der Wiss., pp. 189–196.
Sitter, W. de. 1917. ‘On Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation, and Its Astronomical Consequences, III,’Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 78, 3–28.
Weyl, H. 1921. ‘Zur Infinitesimalgeometrie. Einordnung der projektiven und konformen Auffas sung,’Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, Math.- phys.Kl., pp. 99–112.
Whittaker, E. T. 1928. ‘Note on the Law That Light-Rays are the Null-Geodesies of a Gravitational Field,’Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings 24, 32–34.
Zeeman, E. C. 1964. ‘Causality Implies the Lorentz Group,’Journal of Mathematical Physics 5, 490–493.
The interested reader can also derive much instruction, as I have, from the following writings of Lawrence Sklar
Sklar, L. 1974.Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chapter IV.
Sklar, L. 1977. ‘What Might Be Right about the Causal Theory of Time?,’Synthese 35, 155–171.
Sklar, L. (Forthcoming.), L. (Forthcoming.) ‘Prospects for a Causal Theory of Space-Time,’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Conference on Space, Time and Causality, held at the University of Keele, Summer 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torretti, R. (1983). Causality and Spacetime Structure in Relativity. In: Cohen, R.S., Laudan, L. (eds) Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7057-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7055-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive