Abstract
Theoretical interest in Perelman's thought is linked, for the main part, to the place he accords to the notion of argumentation, defined in his work in reference to the Greek philosophy, as represented by Plato and Aristotle, in contrast to the assertions of the sophists and rhetors. He separates the notion of demonstration and that of argumentation and supports his position on an analysis of the debates which were common in the sophistic and rhetoric period.
It is in different ways that the notion of argumentation comes into the work of Perelman. By taking up again the analysis of justice with the aim of removing the various strata of meaning which had accumulated on it as a result of the reductions of Plato and the dialectical analyses of Aristotle, Perelman showed that the theory of argumentation transcends the domain of right in which it is rooted and ought not be abandoned to lawyers only. Thus, he follows a train of thought to which he accords a certain nobilty in the name of the new rhetoric. This manner of considering the relationship of the moderns to the Greeks leads him to set up the notion of argumentation in his own texts, where it demonstrates a logical retreat which enables him to work back from Aristotle to Plato and from him to the rhetors and sophists, whose discourse is defined on the level of the self-referential.
The exemplary character of Perelman's work is on account of this rehabilitation of argumentation in the old rhetoric which will be examined here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle: Works, especially Art of Rhetoric, Sophistical Refutations, Prior Analytics, Posterior Analytics, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge/London; Topica, Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford.
Barthes, R.: 1970, ‘L'ancienne rhétorique. Aide-mémoire’, Communications 16, 172–229.
Broze, M.: 1986, ‘Justice et mensonge chez Platon’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 156–157, 38–48.
Couloubaritsis, L.: 1978–1979, ‘Dialectique et philosophie chez Aristote’, OiloaoTia 8–9, 229–256.
Couloubaritsis, L.: 1986, ‘Dialectique, rhetorique et critique chez Aristote’ in M. Meyer (ed.), De la métaphysique à la rhétorique. Essais à la memoire de Chaiin Perelman, Editions de t'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 103–108.
Diels, H. and W. Kranz: 19526, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Bd. II, Weidmann, Berlin.
Dupreel, E.: 1932, Traité de Morale, Travaux de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres, Bruxelles.
Dupreel, E.: 1949, Les sophistes. Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias, Editions du Griffon, Neuchâtel.
Genette, G.: 1970, ‘La rhetorique restreinte’, Communications 16, 158–171.
Laufer, R.: 1986, ‘Rhétorique et politique’ in M. Meyer (ed.), De la metaphysique à la rhetorique. Essais à la memoire de Chaïm Perelman, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 189–203.
Leben, Ch.: 1985, ‘Chaïm Perelman ou les valeurs fragiles’, Droits. Revue française de théorie juridique 2, 107–115.
Meyer, M., ed.: 1986, De la métaphysique à la rhetorique. Essais à la memoire de Chaïm Perelman, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. and E. Griffin-Collart: 1979, ‘Bibliographie de Chaïm Perelman’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 127–128, 325–342.
Perelman, Ch.: 1945, De la Justice, Office de Publicité, Bruxelles, now in JR, pp. 9–80.
Perelman, Ch.: 1955, ‘La méthode dialectique et le rôle de l'interlocuteur dans le dialogue’, in Entretiens d'Athènes (avril 1955) de l'Institut International de Philosophie (Dialogue et Dialectique), pp. 179–183, now in JR, pp. 132–139.
Perelman, Ch.: 1962, ‘Scepticisme moral et philosophie morale’, Morale et enseignement 44,22–26.
Perelman, Ch.: 1969, ‘Rhétorique et philosophie’, Les Etudes Philosophiques fase. 1, 1927, now in ChA, pp. 219–227.
Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 19702, Traité de l Argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Perelman, Ch.: 1970, Le champ de Pargumentation, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Perelman, Ch.: 19722, Justice et Raison, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Perelman, Ch.: 19762, Droit, Morale et Philosophie, Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, Paris.
Perelman, Ch.: 1976, Logique juridique. Nouvelle rhetorique, Dalloz, Paris.
Perelman, Ch.: 1977, L'empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation, J. Vrin, Paris.
Perelman, Ch.: 1980, Introduction historique à la philosophie morale, Editions de l'Universite de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Perelman, Ch.: 1981, ‘The rhetorical point of view in ethics: a program’, Communication 6,315–320.
Perelman, Ch.: `‘Logique formelle et logique informelle’ in M. Meyer (ed.), De la méta-physique à la rhetorique. Essais à la memoire de Chaïm Perelman, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 15–21.
Plato: Works, especially Protagoras, Gorgias, Phaedrus, Theaetetus, Collection des Universites de France, Société d'Edition “Les Belles Lettres”, Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A slightly different version of this essay was presented at the Third Intenational Philosophy Symposium on Justice, Athens, 22–27 May 1987.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tordesillas, A. Chaïm Perelman: Justice, argumentation and ancient rhetoric. Argumentation 4, 109–124 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186302
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186302