Abstract
In his writings on teaching, Isreal Scheffler has argued for the close connection between teaching and reason, an argument which can be summarized by, “Teaching is. . an initiation into open rational discussion.” This essay examines Schefflier's thesis in the light of criticisms drawn from feminist writings on teaching. It is argued that Scheffler's thesis is consistent with a view of teaching in which it can be achieved through “kindness, good example and the efficacy of unconscious imitation,” characteristics of the private, reproductive processes typical of women. It is then argued that Scheffler's concept of teaching is compatible with views of education that try to do justice to both reason and emotion, mind and feeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Martin, J.R.: 1970, Explaining, Understanding and Teaching, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Martin, J.R.: 1994, 'Excluding Women from the Educational Realm,' in Lynda Stone (ed.) The Education Feminist Reader, Routledge, New York, pp. 105–121.
Pagano, J.A.: 1994, 'Teaching Women,' in Lynda Stone (ed.), The Education Feminist Reader, Routledge, New York, pp. 252–275.
Passmore, J.: 1980, The Philosophy of teaching, Duckworth, London.
Pestalozzi, J.H.: 1885, Leonard and Gertrude, trans. Eva Channing, Heath, Boston.
Scheffler, I.: 1960, The Language of Education, Thomas, Springfield, Ill.).
Scheffler, I.: 1973, Reason and Teaching, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.
Scheffler, I.: 1991a, In Defense of the Cognitive Emotions, Routledge, New York.
Scheffler, I.: 1991b, 'In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions,' in Scheffler, I. (ed.), In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearson, A.T. Teaching, Reason and Risk. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16, 103–111 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004998904800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004998904800