Abstract
At first sight one might be tempted to regard Descartes' »cogito ergo sum« as logically true by existential generalisation. This however would neither exhaust the specific epistemic content of »cogito« nor reveal the philosophical peculiarities of »sum« which the author takes to have two ontologically different meanings. The full sense of »cogito ergo sum« finally turns out to be “Credo* me* cogitare ergo scio* me* esse1/2”. Furthermore this proposition can formally be proved to be true by means of epistemic logic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Descartes: 1904, Oeuvres edited by C. Adam and P. Tannery, Vol. VII, Cerf, Paris.
Essler, W. K. and R. F. Martínez Cruzado: 1983, Grundzüge der Logik I, Klostermann, Frankfurt.
Gettier, E. L.: 1963, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 121–23.
Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
v. Kutschera, F.: 1976, Intensionale Semantik, de Gruyter, Berlin.
v. Kutschera, F.: 1976, Grundfragen der Erkenntnistheorie, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Lenzen, W.: 1980, Glauben, Wissen, Wahrscheinlichkeit. Springer Verlag, Wien.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The following reflections were indirectly motivated by a stimulating talk that Professor Wolfgang Röd (Innsbruck) presented on quite different aspects of Descartes' philosophy and by the subsequent discussion I had with him and with Professor Arend Kulenkampff (Frankfurt/M). So I owe thanks to both of these gentlemen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trapp, R. » Credo* me* cogitare ergo scio* me* esse1/2 « — Descartes' »cogito ergo sum« reinterpreted. Erkenntnis 28, 253–267 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166445
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166445