Skip to main content
Log in

Skepticism and the Neo-Confucian Canon: I Jinsai’s Philosophical Critique of the Great Learning

Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines I Jinsai’s 伊藤仁斎 (1627–1705) criticisms of the Great Learning (C: Daxue 大學 J: Daigaku). Three primary sources are considered: Jinsai’s Shigi sakumon 私擬策問 (Personal Essays, 1668); the Daigaku teihon 大學定本 (The Definitive Text of the Great Learning, manuscript 1685); and his essay, “Daigaku wa Kōshi no isho ni arazaru no ben” 大學非孔氏之遺書辨 (The Great Learning is not a Writing Confucius Transmitted, 1705), appended to his Gomō jigi 語孟字義. The study suggests that Jinsai’s critical inclinations grew from his acceptance of Zhu Xi’s views about the value of doubt for progress in learning. The study also suggests that Jinsai’s thinking on the Great Learning had political implications derived in many respects from Jinsai’s overall approach to philosophizing via analysis of words and their meanings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe, Yoshio 阿部吉雄. 1965. The Japanese School of Master Zhu and Korea (Nihon Shushigaku to Chōsen 日本朱子學と朝鮮). Tokyo: University of Tokyo.

  • Analects. 1972. A Concordance to the Analects of Confucius. Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center, Inc. Reprint of Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, Supplement No. 16.

  • Bowring, Richard John. 2006. “Fujiwara Seika and the Great Learning.” Monumenta Nipponica, 61/4 (Winter 2006), pp. 437–457.

  • Chan, Wing-tsit. 1986. Neo-Confucian Terms Explained: (The Pei-hsi tzu-i) by Ch’en Ch’un, 1159–1223. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1989. C hu Hsi: New Studies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Beixi 陳北溪. 1632. The Meanings of Human Nature, Principle, and Other Philosophical Terms (C: Xingli ziyi 性理字義 J: Seiri jigi). Kyoto: Nakano Uemon kankō.

  • Cheng Yi 程頤. 1979. Er Cheng quanshu 二程全書. Kyoto: Chūbun shuppan.

  • Ch’ien, Mu. 1986. “Historical Perspective in Chu Hsi’s Learning.” In C hu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism. Edited by Wing-tsit Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • De Bary, W. T. 1983. The Liberal Tradition in China. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Fisher, Galen. 1938. “Dai Gaku Wakumon: A Discussion of Public Questions in the Light of the Great Learning.” Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, Second Series, Vol. XVI.

  • Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. C hu Hsi and the Ta-hsueh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hane, Mikiso, trans. 1974. Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū 日本政治思想史研究), by Maruyama Masao. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hayashi, Razan 林羅山. 1918. “A Study of Different Texts of the Great Learning” (Daigaku ihon kō 大學異本考). In Collected Writings of Teacher Razan (Razan sensei bunshū 羅山先生文集), vol. 2. Kyoto: Heian kokō gakkai.

  • _____. 1984. Selections on Spring’s Mirror (Shunkanshō 春鑑抄) and Selections on the Three Virtues (Santokushō 三徳抄). In F ujiwara Seika/H ayashi Razan 藤原惺窩/林羅山, Nihon shisō taikei vol. 28. Edited by Ishida Ichirō 石田一良 and Kanaya Osamu 金谷治. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • Inoue, Tetsujirō 井上哲次郎. 1902. The Philosophy of the Japanese School of Ancient Learning (Nihon kogakuha no tetsugaku 日本古學派之哲學). Tokyo: Fuzanbō.

  • Itō, Jinsai 伊藤仁斎. 1714. The Definitive Great Learning (Daigaku teihon 大學定本). 1714 Woodblock edition in the Bungakubu etsuranshitsu, Chūtetsubun, Kyoto University.

  • _____. 1985. “Personal Essays” (Shigi sakumon 私擬策問). In I Jinsai/I Tōgai 伊藤仁斎/伊藤東涯, Nihon shisō taikei vol. 33. Edited by Yoshikawa Kōjirō 吉川幸次郎 and Shimizu Shigeru 清水茂. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • _____. 1705. “The Great Learning is not a Writing that Confucius Transmitted” (Daigaku wa Kōshi no isho ni arazaru no ben 大學非孔氏遺書辨). In I Jinsai/ I Tōgai 伊藤仁斎/伊藤東涯, Nihon shisō taikei vol. 33. Edited by Yoshikawa Kōjirō 吉川幸次郎 and Shimizu Shigeru 清水茂. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • Kaizuka, Shigeki 貝塚茂樹. 1972. “A Founding Father of Japanese Confucianism” (Nihon Jukyō no sōshisha 日本儒教の創始者). In I Jinsai 伊藤仁斎. Nihon no meicho 日本の名著 vol. 13. Tokyo: Chūō kōron.

  • Kana shōri. 1984. In F ujiwara Seika/ H ayashi Razan 藤原惺窩/林羅山, Nihon shisō taikei vol. 28. Edited by Ishida Ichirō 石田一良 and Kanaya Osamu 金谷治. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • Kao, Ming. 1986. “CHU Hsi’s Discipline of Propriety.” In C hu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism. Edited by Wing-tsit Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Kimura, Eiichi 木村英一. 1970. “I Jinsai’s Thought” (I Jinsai no shisō 伊藤仁斎の思想). I Jinsai shū 伊藤仁斎集. Nihon no shisō 日本の思想 vol. 11. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.

  • Koyasu, Nobukuni 子安宣邦 1982. I Jinsai’s Thinking about an Ethical World (I Jinsai: Jinrinteki sekai no shisō 伊藤仁斎: 人倫的世界の思想). Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai.

  • _____. 1998. Lectures on the History of Edo Thought (Edo shisōshi kōgi 江戸思想史講義). Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • ______. 2004. The World of I Jinsai (I Jinsai no sekai 伊藤仁斎の世界). Tokyo: Perikansha.

  • Kumazawa, Banzan 熊沢蕃山. 1971. Discussions of the Great Learning (Daigaku wakumon 大學或問). In K umazawa Banzan 熊沢蕃山. Edited by Gotō Yōichi 後藤陽一 and Tomoeda Ryūtarō 友枝龍太郎. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • Legge, James. 1960a. The Chinese Classics, Volume I: Confucian Analects, The Great Learning, The Doctrine of the Mean. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1960b. The Chinese Classics, Volume III: The Shu King. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1960c. The Chinese Classics, Volume IV: The She King. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2003. The Book of Rites. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Jingde 黎靖德. 1984. Classified Conversations of Master Zhu (Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類). Kyoto: Chūbun shuppansha.

  • Marceau, Lawrence. 1996. “Ninjō and the Affective Value of Literature at the Kogidō Academy.” Sino-Japanese Studies, 9/1.

  • Maruyama, Masao 丸山真男. 1952. Studies in the History of Japanese Political Thought (Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū 日本政治思想史研究). Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai.

  • _____. 1974. Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū 日本政治思想史研究). Trans. By Mikiso Hane. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • McMullen, James. 1999. Idealism, Protest, and the Tale of Genji: The Confucianism of K umazawa Banzan. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Mencius. 1966. A Concordance to the Mencius. Harvard Yenching Sinological Index Series. Taipei: Chengwen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minamoto, Ryōen 源了円. 1979. “‘Jitsugaku’ and Empirical Rationalism in the First Half of the Tokugawa Period.” In Principle and Practicality: Essays in Neo-Confucianism and Practical Learning. Edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • _____. 1988. Edo Confucianism: A History of the Reception of the Great Learning (Edo no Jugaku: daigaku juyō no rekishi 江戸の儒學: 『大學』受容の歴史). Kyoto: Shibunkaku shuppansha.

  • Miyake, Masahiko 三宅正彦. 1987. The Formation of the Thought of I Jinsai: A Man of the People in Kyoto (Kyōto machi shū I Jinsai no shisō keisei 京都町衆伊藤仁斎の思想形成). Kyoto: Shibunkaku shuppan.

  • Najita, Tetsuo. 1974. Japan: The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1987. Visions of Virtue in Tokugawa Japan: The Kaitokudō Merchant Academy of Osaka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1998. Tokugawa Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, Herman. 1985. Tokugawa Ideology: Early Constructs, 1570–1680. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaks, Andrew W. 2003 “Appendix III.” Ta Hsüeh and Chung Yung. New York: Penguin.

  • Sagara, Tōru 相良亨. 1998. I Jinsai 伊藤仁斎. Tokyo: Perikansha.

  • Tucker, John Allen. 1998. I Jinsai’s Gomō jigi and the Philosophical Definition of Early Modern Japan. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

  • Wakao, Masaki 若尾政希. 1988. “I Jinsai’s Denial that the Great Learning is a Confucian Text” (I Jinsai: Hi keisho to shite no daigaku kaishaku 伊藤仁斎: 非経書とての『大學』解釈). In Edo Confucianism: A History of the Reception of the Great Learning (Edo no Jugaku: Daigaku juyō rekishi 江戸の儒學: 『大學』受容の歴史). Edited by Minamoto Ryōen 源了円. Kyoto: Shibunkaku shuppansha.

  • Wang, Yangming. 1963. Daxue huowen. In Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by Wang Yangming. Translated by Wing-tsit Chan. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Yagi, Kiyoharu 八木清治. 1988. “Kumazawa Banzan: Methods of Mind Control and Affairs of Governance” (Kumazawa Banzan: shinpō to seiji” 熊沢蕃心法と政事). In Edo Confucianism: A History of the Reception of the Great Learning (Edo no Jugaku: Daigaku juyō rekishi 江戸の儒學: 『大學』受容の歴史). Edited by Minamoto Ryōen 源了円. Kyoto: Shibunkaku shuppansha.

  • Yamaga, Sokō 山鹿素行. 1910. Classified Conversations of Y amaga Sokō (Yamaga gorui 山鹿語類. Tokyo: Kokusho kankōkai.

  • Yamashita, Samuel Hideo. 1983. “The Early Life and Thought of I Jinsai.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 43/2.

  • Yamazaki, Ansai 山崎闇斎. 1980. The Lectures of Y amazaki Ansai on the Great Learning (Daigaku Suika sensei kōgi 大學垂加先生講義. In The Yamazaki Ansai School (Y amazaki Ansai gakuha 山崎闇斎學派), Nihon shisō taikei 日本思想大系 vol. 31. Edited by Nishi Junzō 西順蔵 et al. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

  • Zhu, Xi. 1974. Commentary on the Great Learning (Daxue zhangju 大學章句). In Shisho shitchū 四書集注, Shushi gaku taikei 朱子學大系 (hereafter, SGT), vol. 7. Edited by Suzuki Yoshijirō 鈴木由次郎 et al. Tokyo: Meitoku shuppansha.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Tucker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucker, J.A. Skepticism and the Neo-Confucian Canon: I Jinsai’s Philosophical Critique of the Great Learning . Dao 12, 11–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9302-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9302-1

Keywords

Navigation