Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999)

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, T. and W. Twining: 1991/1998, Analysis of Evidence, Butterworth, London/Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J. and D. Schum: 1996, A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Case Evidence, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, Philip: 1984, 'Logic, Formal Models and Legal Reasoning', 24 Jurimetrics Jo. 334.

  • MacCormick, D. N.: 1978/1992, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malsch, M. and J. F. Nijboer, 1999, Complex Cases: Perspectives on the Netherlands Criminal Justice System, Thela Thesis, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schum, David: 1994, Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, Richard: 1987, Expert Systems in Law, A Jurisprudential Inquiry, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining, William: 1994, Rethinking Evidence, Northwestern U.P.

  • Twining, William and David Miers: 1999, How To Do Things with Rules, Butterworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College, London

    William Twining

Authors
  1. William Twining
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Twining, W. Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). Argumentation 15, 223–229 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011157310039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011157310039

Search

Navigation