Skip to main content
Log in

Nature Quality in Organic Farming: A Conceptual Analysis of Considerations and Criteria in A European Context

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nature quality in relation to farming is a complex field. It involves different traditions and interests, different views of what nature is, and different ways of valuing nature. Furthermore there is a general lack of empirical data on many aspects of nature quality in the farmed landscape. In this paper we discuss nature quality from the perspective of organic farming, which has its own values and goals in relation to nature – the “Ecologist View of Nature.” This is in contrast to the “Culturist View” characteristic of much conventional agriculture and the “Naturalist View” characteristic of the traditional biological approach to nature quality. This threefold distinction forms a framework for exploration of nature quality criteria in the farmed landscape. The traditional work on nature quality has mainly focused on biological interests based on a Naturalist View of Nature. In this paper we will explore how criteria for nature quality based on the Ecologist View can be developed and thereby feed into the ongoing discussion of the development of the organic farming practices. We suggest additional criteria for nature quality based on an Ecologist View of Nature: biodiversity, habitat diversity, extent and structure, functional integrity of habitats and agro-ecosystems, landscape integrity, accessibility, and experientiality. The larger set of Naturalist and Ecologist criteria can provide a wider and more balanced basis for developing nature quality indicators that are relevant in the farmed landscapes. This broader approach to nature quality is also expected to benefit the general societal discussions and decisions on farming and nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ahnström, J., “Ekologiskt Lantbruk Och Biologisk Mangfa ¢ªld-En Litter-aturgenomga ¢ªng” (Organic Farming and Biodiversity, A Literature Review). Report from Center for Utha ¢ªlligt Lantbrug (2002), CUL/SLU, Uppsla.

  • Alrøe, H. F. and E. S. Kristensen, “Research, Values, and Ethics in Organic Agri-culture-Examples From Sustainability, Precaution, Nature Quality, and Animal Welfare,” in Preprints from EurSafe 2000–2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, 2000), pp. 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe, H. F. and E. S. Kristensen, “Towards a Systemic Ethic:in Search of an Ethical Basis for Sustainability and Precaution,” Environmental Ethics 25(1) (2003), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier, P. L. and J. R. Karr, “Biological Integrity Versus Biological Diversity as Policy Directives:Protecting Biotic Resources,” Bioscience 44 (1994), 690–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M., “Background Concepts for Integrated Landscape Analysis,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77 (2000), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arler, F., “Aspects of Landscape or Nature Quality,” Landscape Ecology 15 (2000), 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aude, E., M. B. Pedersen, and K. Tybirk, “Impact on Farming Practice on Succession of Spontaneous Vegetation in Hedgerows,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 99(1–3)(2003), 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsen, J. A. and V. Langer, “Biologiske og Produktionsmæssige Hensyn pa ¢ªDy-rknings. aden og Samspil Med Udyrkede Habitater,” (Biological and Productive Considerations on Fields and Uncultivated Areas)in K. Tybirk and H. F. Alrøe (eds. ), Naturkvalitet i Økologisk Jordbrug, (Nature Quality in Organic Farming).DARCOF Report No. 9 (2000), pp. 55–71.

  • Azeez, G., The Biodiversity Bene ts from Organic Faming. Report (Soil Association/ WWF-UK, 2000), pp. 1–34.

  • Baudry, J., “Interactions Between Agricultural and Ecological Systems at the Landscape Level,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 27 (1989), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J., H. Jones, and H. Setölö, “The Value of Biodiversity,” Trends Ecology and Evolution 12 (1997), 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biao, X., W. Xiaorong, D. Zhuhong, and Y. Yaping, “Critical Impact Assessment of Organic Agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2003), 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J., J. Primdahl, and A. Reenberg, “Rural Land Use and Landscape Dynamics-Analysis of Driving Forces in Space and Time. Land Use Changes and Their Impact in Rural Areas in Europe,” in R. Krönert, J. Baudry, I. R. Bowler, and A. Reenberg (eds. ), Land Use Changes and Their Impact in Rural Areas in Europe. (UNESCO and Parthenon Publishing Group, 1999).

  • Buller, H., G. A. Wilson, and A. Höll, Agri-Environmental Policy in the European Union (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2000).

  • Callicott, J. B., L. B. Crowder, and K. Mumford, “Current Normative Concepts in Conservation,” Conservation Biology 13 (1999), 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, M. and A. B. Larsen, Sma ¢ªbiotoptæthed i Økologiske og Biodynamiske Jordbrug i Østdanmark-og Sammenligning Med Konventionelt Landbrugs Sma ¢ª-biotoptæthed (Density of Small Biotopes i Organic and Biodynamic Farmings Systems in Eastern Denmark-Including Comparison with Conventional Farming Systems). Unpubl. Report (The Royal Danish Agricultural and Veterinary University, Copenhagen, 1995).

  • Clausen, M. and A. B. Larsen, Sma ¢ªbiotoptæthed i Økologisk og Konventionelt Jordbrug i Østdanmark (Density of Small Biotopes i Organic and Conventional Farmings Systems in Eastern Denmark). Report, Centre for Landscape Research, RUC, Roskilde (1997).

  • Collins, K. L., A. Wilcox, K. Chaney, N. D. Boatman, and J. M. Holland, “The In. uence of Beetle Banks on Aphid Predation in Winter Wheat,” Aspects of Applied Biology 50 (1997), 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • DARCOF II, Nature Quality in Organic Farming. Project under the Danish Research Centre for Organic Farming (2003)(online at <http://www. darcof. dk/research/ darco i/iii5. html>. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Dramstad, W. E., G. Fry, W. J. Fjellstad, B. Skar, W. Helliksen, M.-L. B. Sollund, M. S. Tveit, A. K. Geelmuyden, and E. Framstad, “Integrating Landscape-based Values-Norwegian Monitoring of Agricultural Landscapes,” Landscape and Urban Planning 57 (2001), 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli, P. ''Biodiversity Evaluation in Agricultural Landscapes:An Approach at Two Diffierent Scales,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 62 (1997), 81–91.

  • Ejrnæs, R. ''Agerlandets Natur,” (Nature in the Farming Landscape)in J. Holten-Andersen, H. S. Christensen, T. Pedersen, and S. Manninen (eds. ), Dansk Na-turpolitik. Viden og vurderinger (Danish nature policy. Knowledge and assess-ments)(København, Naturra ¢ªdet, 2000), pp. 218–231.

  • Elleman, L., R. Ejrnæs, J. Reddersen, and J. Fredshavn, Det Lysa ¢ªbne Landskab (The open landscape). NERI Techn. Report 372 (2001), 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmholt, S. and J. A. Axelsen, “Jordens Biologi,” (Soil Biology)in H. F. Alrøe, C. B. Andreasen (eds. ), Natur, Miljø og Ressourcer i Økologisk Jordbrug (Nature, Environment and Resources in Organic Farming). DARCOF-report no. 3 (1999), pp. 51–67.

  • EU, Common Agricultural Policy, 2004. http://www. europa. eu. int/comm/agricul-ture/index_en. htm. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Fink, H., “Om Landskabet, Rette Linier og Rundbuestil,” (About the Landscape, Right Lines and Curves)In H.-H. Sass (ed. ), Paradokser og Etik-Landbrug-spolitik?(Paradoxes and Ethics-Agricultural Policy?)(Landbrugets Oplysnings-og Kursusvirksomhed, København, 1993), pp. 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P., Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes (John Wiley, Chichester, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulinck, H., M. Mu´gica, J. V. de Lucio, and J. A. Atauri, “A Framework for Comparative Landscape Analysis and Evaluation Based on Land Cover Data, with an Application in the Madrid Region (Spain),” Landscape and Urban Planning 55 (2001), 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habitats Directive, 2004. http://europa. eu. int/comm/environment/nature/hab-dir. htm. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Hald, A. B. and J. Reddersen, Fugleføde i Kornmarker-Insekter og Vilde Planter (Birds Food in Cereal Fields-Insects and Weeds) Miljøprojekt 125 (Miljøsty-relsen, København, 1990), pp. 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B., H. F. Alrøe, and E. S. Kristensen, “Approaches to Assess the Envi-ronmental Impact from Organic Farming-with Particular Regard to Denmark,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83 (2001), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, K., D. J. Stobbelaar, and J. D. van Mansvelt, “Some Criteria for Land-scape Quality Applied on an Organic Goat Farm in Gelderland, the Netherlands,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63 (1997), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. G., K. Thompson, P. J. Wilson, and A. Bogaard, “Does Biodiversity Determine Ecosystem Function?The Ecotron Experiment Reconsidered,” Functional Ecology 12 (1998), 843–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. G., P. J. Wilson, R. Hunt, J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson, “Allocating C-S-R Plant Functional Types:A Soft Approach to a Hard Problem,” Oikos 85 (1999), 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Højring, K., “Oplevelseskvaliteter Ved Økologisk Jordbrug,” (Quality of Experi-entiality in Organic Farming)in K. Tybirk and H. F. Alrøe (eds. ), Naturkvalitet i Økologisk Jordbrug, (Nature Quality in Organic Farming). DARCOF report no. 9 (2001), pp. 73–82.

  • Hull, R. B., D. P. Robertson, D. Richert, E. Seekamp, and G. J. Buhyo., “Assumptions About Ecological Scale and Nature Knowing Best Hiding in Environmental Decisions,” Conservation Ecology [online ]6(2)(2002), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM, “Basic Standards for Organic Production and Processing,” International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (2002). [Online at www. ifoam. org ] Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Jensen, F. S., Friluftsliv i Det A ¢ªbne Land 1994/95. (Outdoor Life in the Open Land 1995/95)Forskningsserien No. 25 (1998), pp. 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, T. V., “Gode ra ¢ªd til den Økologiske Landmand om Samarbejde,” (Advise on Cooperation for the Organic Farmer)(2001). http://www. lr. dk/oekologi/ diverse/Raad_landmand. htm. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Kareiva, P., “Diversity Begets Productivity,” Nature 368 (1994), 686–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. and D. R. Dudley, “Ecological Perspective on Water Quality Goals,” Environmental Management 5 (1981), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn, D. and M. Verbeek, “Factors A. ecting the Species Composition of Arable Field Boundary Vegetation,” Journal of Applied Ecology 37 (2000), 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromp, B., “Carabid Beetles in Sustainable Agriculture:A Review on Pest Control E. cacy, Cultivation Impacts and Enhancement,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74 (1999), 187–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, D. A., S. D. Wratten, and G. M. Gurr, “Habitat Management to Conserve Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Agriculture,” Annual Review of Entomology 45 (2000), 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, V., “The Potential of Leys and Short Rotation Coppice Hedges as Reser-voirs for Parasitoids of Cereal Aphids in Organic Agriculture,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87 (2001), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cæur, D., J. Baudry, F. Burel, and C. Thenail, “Why and How We Should Study Field Boundary Biodiversity in an Agrarian Landscape Context,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 89 (2002), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, M., “Modelling of Rare Plant Species Richness by Landscape Variables in an Agricultural Area in Finland,” Plant Ecology 149 (2000), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, M., T. Toivonen, and R. K. Heikkinen, “Prediction of Total and Rare Plant Species Richness in Agricultural Landscapes from Satellite Images and Topographic Data,” Landscape Ecology 17 (2002), 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. J. R. and A. C. Moonen, “Field Margins in Northern Europe:Their Functions and Interactions with Agriculture,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 89 (2002), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudsley, M. J., “A Review of the Ecology and Conservation of Hedgerow Invertebrates in Britain,” Journal of Environmental Management 60 (2000), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, B., S. Mark, A. Baatrup-Pedersen, J. Dahl, R. Ejrnæs, J. Fredshavn, J. Hansen, J. E. Lawesson, B. Mu¨nier, P. F. Møller, M. Risager, F. Rune, J. Skriver, and M. Søndergaard, Naturkvalitet-Kriterier og Metodeudvikling (Nature Quality-Criteria and Methodological Development). NERI Techn., Reports 285 (1999), pp. 1–116.

  • Odderskær, P., “Konsekvenser for Sanglærken ved Omlægning til Økologisk Jordbrug,” (Consequences for the Skylard of Conversion into Organic Farming) in V. Langer, T. Dalgaard, L. Mogensen, T. Heidmann, N. Elmegaard, P. Odderskær, and B. Hasler (eds. ), Omlægning af Økologisk Jordbrug i et Lokalomra ¢ªde (Conversion of Organic Farming in a Study Area). DARCOF reports no. 12 (2002), pp. 139–169.

  • OECD, “Environmental Indicators for Agriculture,” Methods and Results (OECD, Paris, 2001)vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2004. http://www. oecd. org/home/. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Pfiffner, L., “Signi cance of Organic Farming for Invertebrate Diversity-Enhancing Bene cial Organisms with Field Margins in Combination with Organic Farming,” in S. Stolton, B. Geier, and J. A. McNeely (eds. ), The Relationship Between Nature, Conservation Biodiversity and Organic Agriculture (IFOAM, IUCN, WWF, 2000).

  • Pfiffner, L. and P. Mader, “Effects of Biodynamic, Organic and Conventional Pro-duction Systems on Earthworm Populations,” Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 15(1–4)(1997), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddersen, J., “The Arthropod Fauna of Organic Versus Conventional Cereal Fields in Denmark,” Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 15 (1997), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddersen, J., “Naturindhold i Økologisk Jordbrug,” (Nature Contents in Organic Farming)in H. F. Alrøe and C. B. Andreasen (eds. ), Natur, Miljø og Ressourcer i Økologisk Jordbrug. (Nature, Environment and Resources in Organic Farming). DARCOF Report no. 3 (1999), pp. 69–84.

  • Reddersen, J., K. Tybirk, N. Halberg, and J. Jensen, Mere og Bedre Natur i Landbrugslandet (More and better nature in the farming landscape). NERI Tech. Report no. 288 (1999), pp. 1–109.

  • Reenberg, A. and J. Baudry, “Land Use and Landscape Changes-The Challenge of Comparative Analysis of Rural Areas in Europe,” in R. Krönert, J. Baudry, I. R. Bowler, and A. Reenberg (eds. ), Land Use Changes and Their Impact in Rural Areas in Europe (UNESCO and the Parthenon group, 1999).

  • Rio-Convention, 2004. http://www. biodiv. org/default. aspx. Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson, Divided We Stand. Rede ning Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Harvester Wheatsheaf (1990).

  • Smeding, F. W. and W. Joenje, “Farm-Nature Plan:Landscape Ecology Based Farm Planning,” Landscape and Urban Planning 46 (1999), 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobbelaar, D. J. and J. D. van Mansvelt, “The Process of Landscape Evaluation,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77 (2000), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolze, M., A. Piorr, A. Höring, and S. Dabbert, The Environmental Impact of Organic Farming in Europe. Report 6 (University of Hohenheim, 2000).

  • Strukturdirektoratet, Aktionsplan II:Økologi i Udvikling (Action Plan II:Developing Organic Farming). Report, Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri (Ministry of food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K. D. and F. Samu, “Effects of Agricultural Diversi cation on the Abundance, Distribution, and Pest Control Potential of Spiders:A Review,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95 (2000), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. B., S. D. Wratten, and N. W. Sotherton, “Creation of 'Island 'Habitats in Farmland to Manipulate Populations of Benefecial Arthropods:Predator Densities and Emigration,” Journal of Applied Ecology 28 (1991), 906–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B., “The Varieties of Sustainability in Livestock Farming,” in J. T. Sørensen (ed. ), Livestock Farming Systems-More Than Food Production. Proc. of the Fourth International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems. EAAP Publ. No. 89 (Waageningen Pers, Waageningen, The Netherlands, 1997), pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, K. Alle Tiders Urskov (The virgin forests)(Nepenthes Forlag, Aarhus, 1996).

  • Tilman, D., “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning,” In G. C. Daily (ed.), Natures Services; Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1997), pp. 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S. and G. Löwei, “The Epigeic Spider Fauna of Single-row Hedges in a Danish Agricultural Landscape,” in S. Toft and N. Scharf (eds. ), Proc. 19th Euro-pean Colloquium of Aracnology 2000 (Aarhus University Press, 2002), pp. 237–242.

  • Tress, B., Landwirtschaft-Landschaft:Umstellungspotential und Landschaftliche Konsequenzen der Ökologischen Landwirtschaft in Dönemark, (Agriculture-Landscape:Potential for Conversion and Consequences for Landscapes of Organic Farming in Denmark)Ph. D. Thesis. (Institut for Geogra og Internationale udviklingsstudier, Roskilde Universitetscenter, 1999).

  • Tybirk, K., “Naturplaner:Integration af Naturhensyn i Landbruget,” (Farm Nature Plans:Integration of Nature Considerations in Agriculture)Flora & Fauna 108(3) (2002), pp. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybirk, K. and H. F. Alrøe, Naturkvalitet i Økologisk Jordbrug (Nature Quality of Organic Farming). DARCOF report no. 9 (2001)(Foulum:DARCOF).

  • Tybirk, K. and R. Ejrnæs, “Økologisk Jordbrugs Bidrag Til Naturbevarelse,” (The Contribution of Organic Farming to Nature Conservation)in K. Tybirk and H. F. Alrøe (eds. ), Naturkvalitet i Økologisk Jordbrug (Nature Quality of Organic Farming). DARCOF report no. 9 (2001), pp. 37–54.

  • US EPA, “Biological Integrity,” U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003) [online at <http://www. epa. gov/bioindicators/html/biointeg. html>]Accessed January 25, 2004.

  • van Elsen, T., “Species Diversity as a Task for Organic Agriculture in Europe,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77 (2000), 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Mansvelt, J. D. and M. S. Lubbe, Checklist for Sustainable Landscape Management (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wascher, D. M. (ed.), AgriEnvironmental Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture in Europe. Report, European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg (2000).

  • Weibull, A.-C., Ö. Östman, and A¢ª. Granqvist, “Species Richness in Agroecosystems: The Effect of Landscape, Habitat and Farm Management,” Biodiversity and Conservation 12 (2003), 1335–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenum, J. H. van, J. C. Buys, and G. A. A. Wossink, “Nature Quality Indicators in Agriculture,” in F. Brouwer and B. Crabtree (eds. ), Environmental Indicators and Agricultural Policy (CAB International, UK, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhjelm, N., Et Rig Natur i et Rigt Samfund. (A Rich Nature in a Rich Society ). Report, Wilhjelmudvalget, Miljø-og Energiministeriet, Copenhagen, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tybirk, K., Alrøe, H.F. & Frederiksen, P. Nature Quality in Organic Farming: A Conceptual Analysis of Considerations and Criteria in A European Context. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17, 249–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033081.92534.d4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033081.92534.d4

Navigation