In this short note we respond to the claim made by Christopher Viger in [4] that Anselm’s so-called ontological argument falls prey to Russell’s paradox. We show that Viger’s argument is based on a flawed premise and hence does not in fact demonstrate what he claims it demonstrates.
CITATION STYLE
Uckelman, S. L. (2010). The ontological argument and Russell’s antinomy. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 18(3–4). https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2009.015
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.