Abstract
This paper takes up the question of the role of philosophical moral theory in our attempts to resolve the ethical problems that arise in health care, with particular reference to the contention that we need theory to be determinative of our choice of actions. Moral theorizing is distinguished from moral theories and the prospects for determinacy from the latter are examined through a consideration of the most promising candidates: utilitarianism, deontology and the procedures involved in reflective equilibrium. It is argued that the current lack of any generally accepted method of solving moral problems, together with the extreme improbability of philosophy achieving a plausibly determinate theory, should encourage us to approach the problems in a spirit of agnosticism regarding the way in which theoretical material might be of relevance. The practical test for both moral theorizing and moral theories is thus not determinacy but the degree to which they increase our understanding of moral problems by serving, as they do in philosophy, as a means of inquiry into their nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archard D (2011) Why moral philosophers are not and should not be moral experts. Bioethics 25:119–127
Arras JD (2007) The way we reason now: reflective equilibrium in bioethics. In: Steinbock B (ed) The Oxford Handbook of bioethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York
Beauchamp TL (2004) Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32:209–217
Bentham J (1967) In: Harrison W (ed) A fragment on government and an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Brink DO (1989) Moral realism and the foundation of ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cribb A (2011) Beyond the classroom wall: theorist-practitioner relationships and extra-mural ethics. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 14(4). doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9289-4
Dancy J (2004) Ethics without principles. Clarendon, Oxford
Daniels N (1996) Justice and justification: reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De Vries R (2011) The uses and abuses of moral theory in bioethics. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 14(4). doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9290-y
Griffin J (1986) Well-being: its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Clarendon, Oxford
Herman B (1993) The practice of moral judgment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hooker B (2000a) Ideal code, real world: a rule-consequentialist theory of morality. Clarendon, Oxford
Hooker B (2000b) Moral particularism: wrong and bad. In: Hooker B, Little MO (eds) Moral particularism. Clarendon, Oxford
Kamm FM (2007) Intricate ethics: rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm. Oxford University Press, New York
Kant I (1996) The metaphysics of morals (trans: Mary Gregor). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kant I (1997) Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (trans: Mary Gregor). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McKeever S, Ridge M (2006) Principled ethics: generalism as a regulative ideal. Clarendon, Oxford
Mill JS (1998) Utilitarianism (ed Roger Crisp). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mulgan T (2007) Understanding Utilitarianism. Acumen, Stocksfield
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Parfit D (1987) Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford
Rawls J (1971, revised edn. 1999a) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rawls J (1999) The independence of moral theory. In: Freeman S (ed) John Rawls: collected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sorell T (2011) The limits of principlism and recourse to theory: the example of telecare. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 14(4). doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9292-9
Sullivan RJ (1989) Immanuel Kant’s moral theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tännsjö T (2011) Applied ethics. A defence. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 14(4). doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9293-8
Tronto JC (2011) Who is authorized to do applied ethics? Inherently political dimensions of applied ethics. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 14(4). doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9294-7
Acknowledgements
My thanks go to the editors for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Upton, H. Moral Theory and Theorizing in Health Care Ethics. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 14, 431–443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9295-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9295-6