We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
In Germany — as probably worldwide — in vitro fertilization (IVF) has provoked disapproval, fears, and dread, but it also raises hope and gives feelings of pride and satisfaction in a new scientific achievement. Critics look for convincing argu- ments that could ban IVF completely or at least restrict it considerably. Some of the most important arguments are outlined below.
The main aspect of IVF that was new to society was that conception could take place outside the female body. Although this fact has made a deep impression on us, no ethical relevance has been attributed to it. One must look further for arguments against IVF.
1. Bundeeärztekammer, ed. Weissbuch. Anfang und Ende menschlichen Lebens — Medizinischer Fortschritt und Ärztliche Ethik. Köln: Deutscher Arzte-Verlag, 1988. Note especially that the decision concerning IVF restriction to married couples is discussed controversially.Google Scholar
2. Kongregation für die Glaubenslehre. Instruction über die Achtung vor dem beginnenden menschlichen Leben und die Würde der Fortpflanzung. Cited in: Wehowsky, S, ed. Lebensbeginn und menschliche Wiirde. Frankfurt Munchen, Campus, 1987:3–31.Google Scholar
3. Stauber, M. Psychosomatische Befunde bei Sterilität. In: Frick-Bruder, V, Platz, P, eds. Psychosomatische Probleme in der Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe. Berlin: Springer, 1984:139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Walters, L. Ethics and the new reproductive technologies: an international review of committee statements. Hastings Center Report 1987;17(Special Suppl.):3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Bayertz, K. GenEthik. Probleme der Technisierung menschlicher Fortpflanzung. Reinbeck: Rowohlt, 1987.Google Scholar
6. Edelstein, L. In: Tomkin, O, Tomkin, CL, eds. Ancient Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967:6.Google Scholar
7. Medical Research International, Soo. f. Assisted Repro. Tech., The American Fertility Society. In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1989 results from the IVF-ET Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1991;55:14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Templeton, AA, Penney, GC. The incidence, characteristics, and prognosis of patients whose infertility is unexplained. Fertility and Sterility 1982;37:175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Abyholm, T, Stray-Pedersen, S. A follow-up study among 285 men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. International Journal of Andrology 1981;4:421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Collins, JA, Wrixon, W, Janes, LB, et al. Treatment-independent pregnancy among infertile couples. New England Journal of Medicine 1983;309:1201–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedRoh, SI, Awadalla, SG, Friedman, CI, et al. In vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer: treatment-dependent versus -independent pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility 1987;48:982–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Wagner, MG, Clair, PASt. Are in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer of benefit to all? The Lancet 1000(10Oct. 28);1027–30.Google Scholar
12. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983:341.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Soules, MR. The in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate: let's be honest with one another. Fertility and Sterility 1986;43:511–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin. Embryonen-Forschung zulaeen eder verbieten? Ethik in der Medizin 1000;2:107–15.Google Scholar
