Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Bechtel and Lloyd

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

The field of cognitive imaging is explodingboth in terms of the amount of our scientificresources dedicated to it and the associatedpublication rate. However, all of this effortis based on a critical question – Do cognitivemodules exist? Both of the reviewers of my book(Uttal, 2001) and I agree that this questionhas not yet been satisfactorily answered and,depending on the ultimate answer, the cognitiveimaging approach as well as some other parts ofthe quest for mechanistic models of mind mightnot be successful. Our views of how our scienceshould respond to this serious problem,however, are quite different. Both ProfessorBechtel and Lloyd argue for an optimisticattack on the problem of the localization ofcognitive processes in the brain based on thehistory of other sciences. I argue that arealistic appreciation of the limits of thisapproach should temper the enthusiasm for whatultimately will go the way of other attempts tounravel the mind-brain problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bremermann, H.J., 1971: What mathematics can and cannot do for pattern recognition, in O.–J. Grusser and R. Klinke (eds), Pattern Recognition in Biological and Technical Systems, Springer–Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremermann, H.J., 1977: Complexity and transcomputability, in R. Duncan and M. Weston–Smith (eds), The Encyclopedia of Ignorance, Pocket Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza, R., and Nyberg, L., 2000: Imaging Cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.D., and Tong, F., 2001: The face of controversy, Science 293, 2405–2407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgetag, C.C., O'Neill, M.A., and Young, M.P., 1996: Indeterminate organization of the visual system, Science 271, 776–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P.E., 1948: On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables, Psychological Review 55, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E.F., 1956: Automata Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R.G., 1974: The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research, in B.H. Kantowitz (ed.), Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 41–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J.R., 1964: Strong inference, Science 146, 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, F., 1999: Words in the brain's language, Behavioral and Brain Science 22, 253–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, J.J., 1950: Nonlinear Vibrations in Mechanical and Electrical Systems, Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W.R., 1998: Toward a New Behaviorism: The Case Against Perceptual Reductionism, Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W.R., 2000: The War Between Mentalism and Behaviorism: On the Accessibility of Mental Processes, Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W.R., 2001: The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uttal, W.R. Response to Bechtel and Lloyd. Brain and Mind 3, 261–273 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019944825779

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019944825779

Navigation