Abstract
All the attempts to find the justification of the privileged evolution of phenomena exclusively in the external world need to refer to the inescapable fact that we are living in such an asymmetric universe. This leads us to look for the origin of the “arrow of time” in the relationship between the subject and the world. The anthropic argument shows that the arrow of time is the condition of the possibility of emergence and maintenance of life in the universe. Moreover, according to Bohr’s, Poincaré’s and Watanabe’s analysis, this agreement between the earlier-later direction of entropy increase and the past-future direction of life is the very condition of the possibility for meaningful action, representation and creation. Beyond this relationship of logical necessity between the meaning process and the arrow of time the question of their possible physical connection is explored. To answer affirmatively to this question, the meaning process is modelled as an evolving tree-like structure, called “Semantic Time”, where thermodynamic irreversibility can be shown.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspect A.: 1972, Thèse de Doctorat. Université Paris X.
Balian R.: 1982, Du Microscopique au Macroscopique. Cours de Physique Statistique de l’Ecole Polytechnique. Paris: Tome 1. Ed. Ellipses.
Balian R.: 1994, Le temps macroscopique. In E. Klein and M. Spiro (eds.) Le temps et sa Flèche Paris: Actes du Colloque de la Société Française de Physique. Flammarion 1996.
Barrow J. D. and Tipler F. J. 1986, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford University Press.
Bell J.S. (1964). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1:195
Benett C.H. (1988) Notes on the History of Reversible Computation. IBM J. Res. Dev. 32: 16
Bergson H.: 1922, Durée et Simultanéité. Re-ed. Presses Universitaires de: France 1998.
Bitbol M.: 1994, Prélude à l’irréversibilité In Science et Avenir (Hors serie) n° 96.
Bitbol M. (1988) The Concept of Measurement and Time Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics. Phil. Sci. 55:349–375
Bohr N.: 1932, Chemistry and the theory of atomic constitution. In J. Kaickar (ed.), Collected Work, Vol. 6. North Holland 1985.
Boltzmann L. 1886, The second law of thermodynamics, In: Boltzmann L. (ed.) Theoretical Philosophical Problems. Reidel: Publ. Brian Mc Guiness. 1974
Boltzmann L.: 1897, Reply to Zermelo, published. In Brush S. G. (ed.) Kinetic Theory, Vol. 2 Irreversible Processes. Oxford: Pergamon, 1966.
Boltzmann L.: 1898, Leçon sur la théorie des gaz. Gabay: French translation, 1987.
Brush S.G. (1966) Kinetic Theory, Vols 1 and 2. Pergamon, Oxford
Bouveresse J.: 1987, Le mythe de l’intériorité. Expérience, signification et langage chez Wittgenstein. Ed. de Minuit. Collection “Critiques”.
Brillouin L. (1956) Science and Information Theory. Academic Press, New York
Carnap R. (1966) Philosophical Foundations of Physics French translation. In: Martin Garden (eds) Armand Colin chap 24. Basic Books, New York
Carter B. 1993, Anthropic Selection Principle and ultra-Darwinian synthesis, In The Anthropic Principle, proceedings of the second Venice Conference on Cosmology and Philosophy (1988). Publ. Bertola F. and Curi U.
Cassirer E.: 1972, La philosophie des formes symboliques. French translation. Ed. de Minuit. Collection “Le Sens Commun”.
Caves C.M. (1990). Entropy and Information: How much Information is Needed to Assign a Probability?. In: Zurek W.H. (eds) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Addisson-Wesley Publishing Company, Readiny, MA
Chaitin G.J. (1977). Algorithmic Information Theory. IBM J. Res. Dev. 21:350–359
Costa de Beauregard 0.: 1963, Le Second Principe de la Science du Temps. Edn. Seuil.
Duhem P. 1906, La théorie Physique. Ed. Vrin. 1981 Paris.
De Witt B. (1967) Quantum theory of gravity I: the canonical theory. Physical Review 160:1113
Eddington A.S. (1928) The nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Elbaz E. (1992) Cosmologie. Edition Ellipses, Paris
Espagnat B.: (d’) 1994 : Le Réel Voilé. Ed. Fayard.
Føllesdal (1975) Meaning and Experience. In: Guttenplan (eds) Mind and Language. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Gal-Or B. (1972) The Crisis About the Origin of Irreversibility and Time Anisotropy. Science 176: 11
Gal-Or B.: 1983, Cosmology, Physics and Philosophy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1983. Part II. Lecture IV: The Arrow of Time.
Gell-Mann M., Hartle J.B. (1990) Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology. In: Zurek W.H. (eds) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Addisson Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
Gold T. (1962) The Arrow of Time. American Journal of Physics. 30:403–410
Hacking I.: 1989, Concevoir et Expérimenter. Ed. C. Bourgeois. Paris: Publ. C. Bourgeois.
Hawking S. (1985) Arrow of Time in Cosmology. Physical Review D 32(10):2489
Hawking S. (1994) The No Boundary Proposal and the Arrow of Time. In: Halliwell J.J., Pérez-Mercader J., Zurek W.H. (eds) Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Klein E.: 2005, Faut-il Distinguer Cours du Temps et Flèche Du Temps? Janvier: Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 2005.
Landauer R. (1961) Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process. IBM J. Res. Dev. 5: 183
Layzer D. (1990) Cosmogenesis: the growth of order in the universe. Publ. Oxford University Press, New York
Merleau-Ponty M.: 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception. Ed. Gallimard
Mehlberg H. 1980, Time, Causality, and the Quantum Theory. Reidel Publishing Company.
Penrose R. (1989) The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Poincaré H.: 1947, Science et Méthode. edn. Paris: Flammarion. First published in 1908.
Price H. (1994) Cosmology, Time’s Arrow, and That Old Double Standard. In: Savitt S. (eds) Time’s Arrow Today. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Price H. (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimede’s Point. University Press, Oxford
Prigogine I. 1980, From Being to Becoming Publ. W. H. Freeman and company.
Reeves H. 1986, L’heure de s’enivrer. Edition Seuil. Col. Point Science.
Reichenbach H. 1956, The direction of Time. University of California Press
Rohlicht F. 1998, The Arrow of Time in the Equations of Motion. Foundations of Physics Vol. 28 n° 7, p. 1045.
Rohlicht F. (2000) Causality and the Arrow of Classical Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 31:1
Szilard L. 1929 quoted in Brillouin L.: 1956, Science and Information Theory. New York: Academic Press
Schneider E.D., Kay J.J. (1995) Order from disorder: the thermodynamics of complexity in biology. In: Murphy M.P., O’Neill L (eds) What is Life? The next Fifty Years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Uzan P.: 1998, Vers une Logique du Temps Sémantique. Irréversibilité, Mesure-quantique et Processus de la Représentation. Lille: Doctorat. Publ. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Uzan P.: 2004, A Cognitive Interpretation of the Notion of ‘Uncertainty in Time’ within the framework of Modern Physics. In Time and Uncertainty. Study of Time Vol 11.
Watanabe S.: 1972, Creative Time. In Fraser, J.T., Haber, F. C., Miiller, G. H. (eds.), Study of Time I: proceedings of the first Conference of the International Society for Study of Time (1969), Oberwolfach West Germany: Black Forest.
Zeh H.D. (1989) The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Time is the substance I am made of. Time is a river which sweeps me along, but I am the river ; it is a tiger which destroys me, but I am the tiger ; it is a fire which consumes me, but I am the fire. – (Jorge Luis Borges)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uzan, P. The Arrow of Time and Meaning. Found Sci 12, 109–137 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-006-0007-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-006-0007-y