Abstract
We elaborate on Israel Scheffler's claim that principles of rationality can be rationally evaluated, focusing on foundational development, by which we mean the evolution of principles which are constitutive of our conceptualization of a certain domain of rationality. How can claims that some such principles are better than prior ones, be justified? We argue that Scheffler's metacriterion of overall systematic credibility is insufficient here. Two very different types of rational development are jointly involved, namely, development of general principles that are strictly constitutive of rationality as such, and development of specific principles determinative of our conceptualization of particular domains. For the first type a transcendental argument applies. As to the second, we show how foundational development is itself a condition of the possibility of its justification. In both cases only principles that are typical of the later stage yield the second order criterion in terms of which the evaluative comparison with former stages can be made and defended. In a discussion of problems involved we indicate to what extent Scheffler's idea of rationally justifiable rational development may be realized here, avoiding pitfalls of both foundationalism and relativism.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Neiman, A., & Siegel, H.: 1993, Objectivity and rationality in epistemology and education: Scheffler's middle road, Synthese, 94,55-83.
Piaget, J.: 1932, Le jugement moral chez l'enfant, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Scheffler, I,: 1960, The Language of Education, Springfield: Thomas.
Scheffler, I,: 1965, Conditions of Knowledge. An introduction to epistemology and education, Chicago: Scott Poresman. `
Scheffler, I.: 1967, Science and Subjectivity, Indianapolis/New York: Hobbs-Merrill.
Scheffler, I.: 1972, Vision and revolution: a postscript on Kuhn. Philosophy of Science, 39, 336-374.
Scheffler, I.: 1973a, Reason and Teaching, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Scheffler, I.: 1973b, Philosophies-of and the curriculum. In J.F. Doyle (Ed.), Educational Judgments. Papers in the philosophy of education (pp. 209-218), London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Scheffler, I.: 1986, Inquiries. Philosophical studies of language, science, and learning, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Scheffler, I.: 1991, In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions and other Essays in the Philosophy of Education, New York/London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Siegel, H.: 1988, Educating Reason. Rationality, critical thinking, and education, New York/London: Routledge.
Siegel, H.: 1992, Justification by balance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 27-46.
Siegel, H.: 1993, Justifying conceptual development claims: response to van Haaften. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 27, 79-85.
Toulmin, S. 1977, Human Understanding. The collective use and evolution of concepts, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
van Haaften, A.W.: 1984, Een ontwikketingstheoretische benadering van de 'is-ought question' [A developmental approach to the is-ought question]. Pedagogische Studiës, 61, 272-281.
van Haaften, A.W.: 1990b, The justification of conceptual development claims. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24, 51-69.
van Haaften, A.W: 1990b, Can moral education be justified in moral education? In B. Spiecker & R. Straughan (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Moral Education and Development (pp. 17-42), Milton Keynes/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
van Haaften, A.W.: 1993, Conceptual development and relativism: reply to Siegel. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 27, 87-100.
van Haaften, A.W., Korlhals, M., Widdershoven, G.A.M., Mul, J. de, & Snik, G.L.M.: 1986. Ontwikkelingsfilosofie [Philosophy of Development]. Muiderberg: Coutinho
van Haaften, A.W., Korthals, M., & Wren, T.: 1996, Philosophy of Development. Reconstructing the foundations of human development and education, Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Haaften, W., Snik, G. Critical Thinking and Foundational Development. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16, 19–41 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004938718913
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004938718913