Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of Conventional Meaning and Conversational Principles

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study language use and language organisation by making use of Lewisean signalling games. Standard game theoretical approaches are contrasted with evolutionary ones to analyze conventional meaning and conversational interpretation strategies. It is argued that analyzing successful communication in terms of standard game theory requires agents to be very rational and fully informed. The main goal of the paper is to show that in terms of evolutionary game theory we can motivate the emergence and self-sustaining force of (i) conventional meaning and (ii) some conversational interpretation strategies in terms of weaker and, perhaps, more plausible assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Asher, N., I. Sher and M. Williams: 2001, ‘Game Theoretical Foundations for Gricean Constraints’, in R van Rooy and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. and W. Hamilton: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’, Science 411: 1390–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D.: 1953, ‘Equivalent Comparisons of Experiments’, Annals of Mathemathical Statistics 24 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: 2000, ‘Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation’, Journal of Semantics 17: 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.: 1996, Using Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V. and J. Sobel: 1982, ‘Strategic Information Transmission’, Econometrica 50, 1431–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W.: 2000, Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach, Longman Linguistic Library, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A.: 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A.: 1990, ‘Biological Signals as Handicaps’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 144, 517–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H.: 2000, Game Theory Evolving, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review 66: 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1967, ‘Logic and Conversation’, typescript from the William James Lectures, Harvard University. Published in P. Grice (1989), Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein: 1995, ‘Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse’, Computational Linguistics 21, 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: 1984, ‘Towards a New Taxonomy of Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature’, in D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, GURT84, Washington; Georgetown University Press, pp. 11–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P.: 1995, ‘Communication in Discrete Action-Response Games’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 174, 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J.: 1989, ‘Biological Evolution of the Saussurian Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device’, Lingua 77, 187–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J.: 2000, ‘The Emergence of Syntax’, in C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy and J. Hurford (eds.), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form, (editorial introduction to section on syntax), Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–230.

  • Kandori, M., G. J. Mailath, and R. Rob: 1993, ‘Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games’, Econometrica 61, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S. and J. Hurford: 2001, ‘The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An Overview of the Iterated Learning Model’, in D. Parisi and A. Cangelosi (eds.), Simulating the Evolution of Language, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarova, N., P. Niyogi, and M. Nowak: 2001, ‘The Evolutionary Dynamics of Grammar Acquisition’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 209, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, M., Sz. Szamado, and C. Bergstrom: manuscript, ‘The Peacock, the Sparrow, and Evolution of Human Language’, Santa Fe Institute working paper nr. 00-12-74.

  • Levinson, S.: 2000, Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1969, Convention, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, D. W.: 1991, How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. and G. R. Price: 1973, ‘The Logic of Animal Conflict’, Nature 146, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J.: 1982, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. and D. Harper: 1995, ‘Animal Signals: Models and Terminology’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 177, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.: 1980, ‘Circumscription - A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G.: 1984, Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. and D. Krakauer: 1999, ‘The Evolution of Language’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 8028–8033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliphant, M.: 1996, ‘The Dilemma of Saussurean Communication’, BioSystems 37, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M. and A. Rubinstein: 1994, A course in Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, P.: 1991, ‘Communication and Strategic Inference’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 473–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, P.: 2001, The Use of Language, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooy, R. van: 2003, ‘Quality and Quantity of Information Exchange’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 423–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooy, R. van: in press, ‘Signaling Games Select Horn Strategies’, Linguistics and Philosophy, to appear.

  • Rooy, R. van and K. Schulz: manuscript, ‘Pragmatic Meaning and Non-Monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation’, University of Amsterdam.

  • Schelling, T.: 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S.: 1972, Meaning, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R.: 1980, ‘A Note on Evolutionary Stable Strategies in Asymmetric Animal Contests’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 84, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.: 1948, ‘The Mathematical Theory of Communication’, Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623-656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1994, ‘Darwin Meets The Logic of Decision: Correlation in Evolutionary Game Theory’, Philosophy of Science 61, 503–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1996, Evolution of the Social Contract, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: manuscript, ‘Signals, Evolution and the Explanatory Power of Transient Information’, University of California, Irvine.

  • Spence, M.: 1973, ‘Job Market Signalling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L.: 2000, ‘The Emergence of Grammar in Communicating Autonomous Robotic Agents’, in W. Horn (ed.), Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI2000, nr. CONF14, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 764–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1964, ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts’, Philosophical Review 75, 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. and L. Jonker: 1978, ‘Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics’, Mathematical Biosciences 40, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuyls, K. et al.: this volume, ‘An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Perspective on Learning in Multi-Agent Systems’, Knowledge, Rationality and Action.

  • Vanderschraaf, P.: 1995, ‘Convention as Correlated Equilibrium’, Erkenntnis 42, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wärneryd, K.: 1993, ‘Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Evolutionary Stability’, Games and Economic Behavior 5, 532–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. W.: 1995) Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A.: 1998, ‘Protolanguage as a Holistic System for Social Interaction’, Language and Communication 19, 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P.: 1993, ‘The Evolution of Conventions’, Econometrica 61, 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A.: 1975, ‘Mate Selection - A Delection for a Handicap’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Rooy, R. Evolution of Conventional Meaning and Conversational Principles. Synthese 139, 331–366 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000024904.37199.6c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000024904.37199.6c

Keywords

Navigation