Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:28:48.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Kantian Critique of the Care Tradition: Family Law and Systemic Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Helga Varden
Helga Varden*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
*
Email: hvarden@illinois.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relations’ inherent (inter)dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workers’ and care-receivers’ systemic conditions. I apply Kant’s theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice.

Keywords

Kant’s doctrine of rightprivate rightpublic rightcare relations
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 08 June 2012 , pp. 327 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette C. (1995) ‘The Need for More than Justice’. In Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 18–32.Google Scholar
Clement, Grace (1996) Care, Autonomy, and Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn (2008) ‘Care Ethics and Moral Theory’ [review of Held 2006]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77/2, 539–555.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia (2006) The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva F. (1999) Love's Labour: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1996) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice. Rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (2001) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. In Samuel Freeman (ed.), Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 573–615.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2006) ‘Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls’. Virginia Law Review, 92, 1391–1438.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John (2000) Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan (2005) ‘An Ethic of Care’. In Ann E. Cudd and Robin O. Andreasen (eds), Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 251–263.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga (2006) ‘Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State's Right to Redistribute Resource to Protect the Rights of Dependents’. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 45, 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga (2007) ‘A Kantian Conception of Rightful Sexual Relations: Sex, (Gay) Marriage and Prostitution’. Social Philosophy Today, 22, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga (2008) ‘Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature’. Kantian Review, 13/2, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga (2010) ‘Kant's Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy: How Public Right “Concludes” Private Right in “The Doctrine of Right”’. Kant-Studien, 3, 331–351.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1976) ‘Character and Morality’. In A. O. Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), pp. 197–216.Google Scholar