Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Politization of Technology and Sustainability: A Plea for Visioning

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most protagonists of sustainable development ignore modern insights in the nature of technology, which has led to an emphasis on technological solutions. The notable exception is transition management. However, both social construction of technology and transition management have been criticized as ignoring distributions of power in society, and for not offering guidance in the choice of the most sustainable technologies. The reviewer criticizes this approach: the issue is not to choose the right technologies, but to address the root causes of unsustainability in society. In addition to politization of transition management the reviewer argues that strong visions are necessary to lead the way. Technologies could help to develop those visions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ehrenfeld J. (2008) Sustainability by design. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis E. (2011) Sustainability transitions and the nature of technology. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quist J., Vergragt P. (2006) Past and future of back-casting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38(9): 1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quist, J. (2007). Backcasting for a sustainable future: The impact after 10 years, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.

  • Speth J. G. (2008) The bridge at the edge of the World: Capitalism, the environment, and crossing from crisis to sustainability. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt P. (2009) CCS in the Netherlands: Glass half empty or half full?. In: Meadowcroft J., Langhelle O. (eds) Caching the carbon; the politics and policy of carbon capture and storage, chapter 8. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 186–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt P. J., van Grootveld G. (1994) Sustainable technology development in the Netherlands; the first phase of the dutch STD program. Journal of Cleaner Production 2(3–4): 133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt, P. J., Markusson, N., & Karlsson, H. (2011). Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, P., Jansen, L., van Grootveld, G., van Spiegel, E., & Vergragt, P. (2000). Sustainable technology development. Greenleaf Publishing, ISBN 1-874719-09-8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tellus Institute, 11 Arlington Street, Boston, MA, 02116-3411, USA

    Philip J. Vergragt

Authors
  1. Philip J. Vergragt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip J. Vergragt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vergragt, P.J. Beyond Politization of Technology and Sustainability: A Plea for Visioning. Found Sci 18, 361–365 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9270-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9270-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation