Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Girle, R., Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., and Verheij, B. (2000). Decision Support for Practical Reasoning: A Theoretical and Computational Perspective. Bonskeid Symposium on Argument and Computation. See http://www.metajur.unimaas.nl/~bart/papers/bonskeid.htm.

  • Hage, J. (1997). Reasoning with Rules. An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (2000). Dialectical Models in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8: 137-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 331-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, B. (1996). Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat. Dissertation. Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht. See http://www.metajur.unimaas.nl/~bart/proefschrift/.

  • Verheij, B. (1999). Logic, Context and Valid Inference. Or: Can There be a Logic of Law? In H.J. van den Herik, M.-F. Moens, J. Bing, B. van Buggenhout, J. Zeleznikow, and C.A.F.M. Grütters (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems. JURIX 1999: The Twelfth Conference, 109-121. Gerard Noodt Instituut: Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, B. (2001). Legal Decision Making as Dialectical Theory Construction with Argumentation Schemes. The 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of the Conference, 225-226. ACM, New York. See http://www.metajur.unimaas.nl/ bart/papers/argsch.htm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Metajuridica, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Bart Verheij

Authors
  1. Bart Verheij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verheij, B. Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review). Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 305–313 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013803600690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013803600690

Search

Navigation