Abstract
In his article In Between Us, Yoni van den Eede expands existing theories of mediation into the realm of the social and the political, focusing on the notions of opacity and transparency. His approach is rich and promising, but two pitfalls should be avoided. First, his concept of ‘in-between’ runs the risk to conceptualize mediation as a process ‘between’ pre-given entities. On the basis of current work in postphenomenology and actor-network theory, though, mediation should rather be seen as the origin of entities, not as an intermediary between them. Second, Van den Eede’s separate discussion of transparency and opacity in ‘use’ and in ‘context’ runs the risk to make invisible the complementarity of the two dimensions. While transparency of use embodies an experiential form of the distinction between transparency and opacity, transparency of context embodies a more cognitive dimension of the distinction. Only by linking the two it becomes possible to take responsibility for the impact that technological mediations can have. Users and designers need a ‘double vision’ to simultaneously see the transparency of both use and context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dorrestijn S. (2006) Michel Foucault et l’éthique des techniques: Le cas de la RFID. Université Paris X (Mémoire.), Nanterre
Feenberg, A. (2009). Peter-Paul Verbeek: review of what things do. In: Human studies 32(2), ISSN 0163-8548, pp 225–228.
Goeminne G., Paredis E. (2011) Opening up the in-between: Ihde’s postphenomenology and beyond. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3): 101–107
Ihde D. (1993) Postphenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Kaplan, D. (2009). What things still don’t do. In: Human studies 32(2), ISSN 0163-8548, pp 229–240.
Kiran, A. (2009). The Primacy of Action. Technological Co-Constitution of Practical Space. NTNU, (Dissertation), Faculty of arts.
Van Den Eede Y. (2011) In between us: On the transparency and opacity of technological mediation. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3): 139–159
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Verbeek P. P. (2006) Materializing morality—design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values 31(3): 361–380
Verbeek P. P. (2008) Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality—a postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies 31(1): 11–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verbeek, PP. Expanding Mediation Theory. Found Sci 17, 391–395 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9253-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9253-8