Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in Double Standards

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender differences in the use of double standards in ethical judgements of questionable conduct instigated by business or consumers. We investigate if consumers are more critical towards unethical corporate versus consumer actions and if these double standards depend on the gender of the respondent. In the first study, we compared evaluations of four specific unethical actions [cfr. DePaulo, 1987, in: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)] instigated by either the consumer or the corporation. In a second study, we investigated the perception of some general consumer and corporate (un)ethical actions in addition to DePaulo’s unethical scenarios. Both researches show that females are less likely to use double standards when it comes to their own (un)ethical behaviour compared to corporate (un)ethical actions. Furthermore, gender differences in the use of double standards depend on the type of unethical behaviour. Limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett T. (2001) Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31(5): 1038–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beu D. S., M. R. Buckley, M. G. Harvey (2003) Ethical Decision-Making, A Multidimensional Construct. Business Ethics: A European Review 12:88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bone P. F., R. J. Corey (2000) Packaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers, and Ethically-Interested Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski S. C., Y. J. Urgas (1998) Business Students and Ethics: A Meta Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 11(7):1117–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan A., S. Wong, P. Leung (1998) Ethical Beliefs of Chinese Consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics 17:1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. R., L. W. Pand, D. J. Sharp (2001) An Examination of Differences in Ethical-Decision Making Between Canadian Business Students and Accounting Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics 15:889–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins D. (2000) The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1500 Articles published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 26:1–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creyer E. H., W. T. Ross (1997) Tradeoffs between Price and Quality: How a Value Index Affects Preference Formation Journal of Consumer Affairs 31(2):280–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown D. F., M. S. Spiller (1998) Learning from the Literature on College Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research Journal of Business 17(6):683–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R.M.: 1979, ‹Comparison of Consumer Acceptance of Rights and Responsibilities’, in N. M. Ackerman (ed.), Proceedings 25th Annual Conference of the American Council on Consumer Interests

  • Dawson L. M. (1997) Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1143–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo P.: 1987, ‹Ethical Perceptions of Deceptive Bargaining Tactics Used by Salespersons and Customers: A Double Standard’, in: J. Sagert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)

  • DePaulo P.: 1985, ‹The Ethics of Deception in Retail Bargaining: Do Consumers Accept the Game Analogy?’, Paper Presented at the 1985 Conference of the Southwestern Marketing Association, New Orleans

  • Deshpande S. P. (1997) Managers Perception of Proper Ethical Conduct: The Effect of Sex, Age and Level of Education. Journal of Business Ethics 16(1): 79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson J., J. White (1995) Toward the Feminine Firm: An Extension to Thomas White. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3): 463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. (1981) What is Business Ethics? The Public Interest 63(2): 18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkes V. S., M. Kamins (1999) Effects of Information about Firms Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3): 243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke G. R., D. E. F. Crown, D. F. Spake (1997) Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6): 920–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton S., K. B. Kerch, H. R. Dodge (1996) Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behaviour in the Market Place. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith S., H. B. Stephenson (1993) Decision Rules used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: 1999, ‹The Idea of a Female Ethic’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Inc)

  • Harris J., C. Sutton (1995) Unravelling the Ethical Decision Making Process: Clues from an Empirical study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 805–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman J. (1998) Are Women Really More Ethical Than Men? Maybe it depends on the Situation. Journal of Managerial Issues 10: 60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A. (1997) Are Women more Ethical than Men? Baylor Business Review 15: 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram R., Skinner S. J., V. A. Taylor (2005) Consumers’ Evaluation of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3): 237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G., M. Kavanaugh (1996) An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioural Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J. L., K. L. Middleton (2007) Ethical Decision-Making by Consumers: The Roles of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability. Journal of Business Ethics 70: 247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights D., M. O’Leary (2006) Leadership, Ethics and Responsibility to the Other. Journal of Business Ethics 67(2): 125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development in Essays on Moral Development, Volume 2. Harper and Rowe, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak G. R., P. E. Murphy (1991) Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 10(4): 259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe T., W. A. Weeks (2000) An Experiment Investigation of Efforts to Improve Sales Students’ Moral Reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 20: 243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez Y. P., Rechner P. L., J. B. Olson-Buchanan: (2005) Shaping Ethical Perceptions: An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Business Education, Culture and Demographic Factors. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason E. S., P. E. Mudrack (1996) Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 599–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe A. C., Ingram R., M. C. Dato-On (2006) The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64(2): 101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick D. M, M. H. Bazerman (1996) Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making. Sloan Management Review 37(2): 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncy J. A., S. J. Vitell (1992) Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Research 24: 297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon M. J., K. D. Butterfield (2003) A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 375–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas M. Y. A. (1996) Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Austrian Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 15(9): 1009–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R., D. Robin (1990) Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 639–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter B. A. (2006) Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-Making Process in Business Students. Journal of Business Ethics 68: 153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin D., L. Babin (1997) Making Sense of the Research in Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S. L., R. J. Bennett (1995) A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviours: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal 38: 555–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxas M. L., J. Y Stoneback (2004) The Importance of Gender across Cultures. Journal of Business Ethics 50: 149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger D., E. W. King (1992) A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simga-Mugan C., B. A. Daly, D. Onkal, L. Kavut (2005) The Influence of Nationality and Gender on Ethical Sensitivity: An Application of the Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S. (1996) The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4): 469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. L, E. F. Oakley (1997) Gender-Related differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth M. L., J. R. Davis (2004) Perceptions of Dishonesty among 2-Year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51: 63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strutton D., S. J. Vitell, L. E. Pelton (1994) How Consumers May Justify Inappropriate Behaviour in Market Settings: An Application on the Techniques of Neutralization. Journal of Business Research 30(3): 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis J., M. Ortiz-Buonafina (1990) Ethical Beliefs’ Differences of Males and Females. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevion L. K., Weaver G. R., S. J. Reynolds (2006) Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review. Journal of Management 32(6): 951–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kenhove P., I. Vermeir, S. Verniers (2001) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure. Journal of Business Ethics 32(4): 347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell S. J., J. A. Muncy (1992) Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics 11(8): 585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell S. J. (2003) Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future. Journal of Business Ethics 43: 33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkema R. J. (2004) Demographic, Cultural, and Economic Predictors of Perceived Ethicality of Negotiation Behavior: A Nine-Country Analysis. Journal of Business Research 57(1): 69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks W. A., C. W. Moore, J. A. McKinney, J. G. Longenecker (1999) The Effect of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley B. E. Jr., A. B. Nelson, C. J. Jones (1999) Gender Differences in Cheating Attitudes and Classroom Cheating Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis. Sex Roles 41: 657–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whysall P. (2000) Addressing Ethical Issues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3): 305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes R. E. (1978) Fraudulent Behaviour by Consumers. Journal of Marketing 42: 67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G. (1995) Ethics at the Purchasing/Sales Interface: An International Perspective. International Marketing Review 12(4): 7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Vermeir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vermeir, I., Van Kenhove, P. Gender Differences in Double Standards. J Bus Ethics 81, 281–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9494-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9494-1

Keywords

Navigation