Skip to main content
Log in

The Meaningfulness of Meaning Questions

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contra an expanding number of deflationary commentators onWittgenstein, I argue that philosophical questions about meaningare meaningful and that Wittgenstein gave us ample reason tobelieve so. Deflationists are right in claiming that Wittgensteinrejected the sceptical problem about meaning allegedly to befound in his later writings and also right in stressing Wittgenstein's anti-reductionism. But they are wrong in taking these dismissals to entail the end of all constructive philosophizing about meaning. Rather, I argue, the rejection of the sceptical problem requires that we abandon the questions that philosophers have traditionally addressed and that we replace them with more appropriate ones, to which constructive answers are forthcoming. However, though quietism is not the only alternative to reductionism, the rejection of reductionism does oblige us seriously to revise our sense of what constructive philosophy can achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burge, T.: 1989, 'Wherein is Language Social?', in A. George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S.: 1962, 'The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy', The Philosophical Review, LXXI, 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1991, 'Epistemology Externalized', Dialectica 45, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, C.: 1989, 'Rules: Looking in the Right Place', in D. Z. Phillips and P. Winch (eds), Wittgenstein: Attention to Particulars, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, R.: 1987, Wittgenstein, 2nd edition, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H-J: 1991, 'Philosophical Investigations Section 128: “Theses in Philosophy” and Undogmatic Procedure', in R. L. Arrington and H-J Glock (eds), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, Text and Context, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, W.: 1983, 'I Want You To Bring Me A Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the Philosophical Investigations', Synthese 56, 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, W.: 1985, 'Kripke on Wittgenstein on Rules', Journal of Philosophy 82, 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, W.: 1992, 'Wittgenstein on Understanding', in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume XVII, The Wittgenstein Legacy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmy, S. S.: 1991, '“Tormenting Questions' in Philosophical Investigations Section 133', in R. L. Arrington and H-J Glock (eds), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, Text and Context, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B.: 1987, 'Subjective Intentionality', Philosophical Topics 15, 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N.: 1986, Nothing is Hidden, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1984, 'Wittgenstein on Following a Rule', Synthese 58, 325–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1986, 'Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space', in P. Pettit and J. McDowell (eds), Subject, Thought and Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1992, 'Meaning and Intentionality inWittgenstein's Later Philosophy', in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume XVII, The Wittgenstein Legacy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1984, Wittgenstein on Meaning, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, D.: 1988, The False Prison, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, 'The Meaning of “Meaning” ', in his Language, Mind, and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1995, Pragmatism, An Open Question, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1983, Intentionality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, B.: 1965, 'Wittgenstein on Logical Necessity', The Philosophical Review, LXXIV, 504–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen, C.: 1995, 'Wittgenstein and “Solitary” Languages', Philosophical Investigations 184, 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen, C.: 1997, 'Davidson's Second Person', The Philosophical Quarterly 47(188), 361–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.: 1998, 'Semantic Realism and Kripke's Wittgenstein', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LVII(1), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1958, Philosophical Investigations, tr. G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd edition, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verheggen, C. The Meaningfulness of Meaning Questions. Synthese 123, 195–216 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005243504897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005243504897

Keywords

Navigation