Abstract
In this short reply to Riis’ paper I first deal with his perceptive defence of ICT literacy, to which I fully subscribe, showing how his ideas might gain from highlighting the ‘technical’ dimensions involved in literacy practices. Second, this will allow me to make some comments regarding the curricular and organizational aspects of contemporary (school) education, which forms the largest part of his paper. My main line of criticism towards Riis’ paper is that I defend a ‘technical’ rather than a ‘non-technical’ account of digital literacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 27–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, T. (2010). Mediologische Bedingungen von Bildung und Erziehung. In A. Liesner & I. Lohmann (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Bedingungen von Bildung und Erziehung. Eine Einführung (pp. 141–151). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vlieghe, J. (2013). Education in an age of digital technologies. Flusser, Stiegler and Agamben on the idea of the posthistorical. Philosophy and Technology,. doi:10.1007/s13347-013-0131-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vlieghe, J. ICT Literacy: A Technical or Non-technical Issue?. Found Sci 22, 401–404 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9458-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9458-3