Skip to main content
Log in

Privacy as life, liberty, property

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cluster of concerns usually identified asmatters of privacy can be adequately accountedfor by unpacking our natural rights to life,liberty, and property. Privacy as derived fromfundamental natural rights to life, liberty,and property encompasses the advantages of thecontrol and restricted access theories withouttheir attendant difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Anicelli. Privacy and the Safe Harbors Agreement. Unpublished Honors Thesis completed under the direction of Terrell Ward Bynum. Southern Connecticut State University, 2001.

  • J. DeCew. In Pursuit of Privacy: Laws, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Elgesem. The Structure of Right in Directive 95/46/EC on the Protection of Individuals With Regard to the Processing of personal Data and the Free Movement of Such Data. In R. Spinello and H. Tavani, editors, Cyberethics. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.N. Hohfeld. Fundamental Legal Conceptions, W.W. Cook, editor. Yale University Press, New Haven CT, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Locke. Second Treatise on Government, 1690 [online]. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com / Locke / second / second-frame.html.

  • J. Moor. Towards a Theory of Privacy in the Information Age. In T. Bynum and S. Rogerson, Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibililty. Blackwell, Oxford, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Neill. Rites of Privacy: On the Limits of Protection for the Self. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal/Kingston, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Nissenbaum. Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public. Law And Philosophy, 17: 559-596, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nozick. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rachels. Why is Privacy Important? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 323-333, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rachels and W. Ruddick. Lives and Liberty. In J. Christman, editor, The Inner Citadel. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rosencrance. Children's Web Site to Shut Down Chat Rooms, email. Computerworld, 2000 [online]. http://www.computerworld.com / managementtopics / ebusiness / story / 0, 10801,50248,00.html.

  • T. Scanlon. Thomson on Privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 315-322, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Spinello. Trespass and Kyosei in Cyberspace. Proceedings for CEPE 2003, pp. 117-130. Boston College, 2003.

  • R. Spinello and H. Tavani. Readings in Cyberethics. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomson. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1: 47-66, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomson. Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomson. The Realm of Rights. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volkman, R. Privacy as life, liberty, property. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 199–210 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000017739.09729.9f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000017739.09729.9f

Navigation