Skip to main content
Log in

Religion in a private igloo? A critical dialogue with Richard Rorty

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is still a popular philosophical position to call for a strict “separationism” concerning the private and the public sphere when it comes to religious convictions. Richard Rorty is one prominent supporter of this claim. The traditional critique against this division is mostly built on a particular characterization of religion that is at odds with Rortian assumptions. In this article, however, Rorty is criticized on his own terms turning pragmatically the objection to a fully internal one. What Rorty values most, namely a tolerant and ironic liberalism as the capacity to describe oneself in new and interesting ways is precisely the role, I argue, that religious faith could play under “neo-liberal” conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amesbury R. (2008) Religious neutrality and the secular state: The politics of God’s absence?. In: Dalferth I. U. (eds) The presence and absence of God. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Brümmer, V. (2010). Dawkins’ religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 52, 2.

  • Casanova J. (1994) Public religions and the modern world. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant J. (2000) Freedom, cruelty, and truth: Rorty versus Orwell. In: Brandom R. (eds) Rorty and his critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford/Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalferth I. U. (2010) Post-secular society: Christianity and the dialectics of the secular. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78(2): 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstain J. B. (2003) Don’t be cruel: Reflexions on Rortyan liberalism. In: Guignon C., Hiley D. R. (eds) Richard Rorty (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogarten F. (1956) Der Mensch zwischen Gott und Welt. Vorwerk, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2005a). Religion in der Öffentlichkeit. Kognitive Voraussetzungen für den ,öffentlichen Vernunftgebrauch’ religiöser und säkularer Bürger. In idem, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

  • Habermas, J. (2005b). Die Grenze zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Zur Wirkungsgeschichte und aktuellen Bedeutung von Kants Religionsphilosophie. In idem, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1955). In J. Hoffmeister (Ed.), Die Vernunft in der Geschichte (5th ed.). Hamburg: Meiner.

  • Heidegger M. (1959) Unterwegs zur Sprache (14th ed.). Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece G. L. (2002) Irony and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (PMN). Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (CIS). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (1997) Truth, politics and ’post-modernism’ (TP). Spinoza lectures.. Amsterdam, Van Gorcum

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope (SH). Pinguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (2001). Philosophie & die Zukunft. Essays (PZ) (2nd ed.). Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer (original German edition).

  • Rorty R. (2003a) Religion in the Public Square: A reconsideration (PS). Journal of Religious Ethics 31(1): 141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (2003b). Der Roman als Mittel zur Erlösung aus der Selbstbezogenheit (R). In J. Küpper & C. Menke (Eds.), Dimensionen ästhetischer Erfahrung (pp. 49–66). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp (original German article).

  • Rorty R. (2007) Philosophy as Cultural Politics (PC). Philosophical papers IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R., Vattimo G. (2005) The Future of Religion (RV) (S. Zabala, Ed.). Columbia University Press, New York

  • Rössler, B. (2007). Der Wert des Privaten. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.

  • Schapp W. (1953) In Geschichten verstrickt. Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding (4th ed.). Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt a.M

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (2002) Varieties of religion today. William James revisited. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2005). Self-interpreting animals [1985]. In Human agency and language. Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tillich, P. (1975). Die religiöse Substanz der Kultur. In Schriften zur Theologie der Kultur (Gesammelte Werke, ed. by R. Albrecht, Bd. IX) (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Kreuz Verlag.

  • Vattimo G. (1999) Belief. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hartmut von Sass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Sass, H. Religion in a private igloo? A critical dialogue with Richard Rorty. Int J Philos Relig 70, 203–216 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9292-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9292-7

Keywords

Navigation