Skip to main content
Log in

Salomon Maimon: Essay on transcendental philosophy. Nick Midgley, Henry Somers-Hall, Alistair Welchman and Merten Reglitz (trans)

Continuum Press, New York, 2010 (orginally 1790), 352 pp., paperback, $24.95, ISBN: PB: 978-1-4411-1384-9

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Maimon (2001), originally published under the title Salomon Maimons Lebensgeschichte in 1792.

  2. Fichte, ‘Letter to Reinhold, March or April 1795' (1970, p. 282).

  3. Atlas (1964, pp. 12–3).

  4. Maimon (1970, p. 155).

  5. Kant, in Maimon (2010, p. 231).

  6. Kant, in Maimon (2010, p. 236).

  7. Atlas (1964, p. 19).

  8. Nick Midgley, in Maimon (2010, p. xliv).

  9. Deleuze discusses the notion of ‘internal difference’ at first in relation to Bergson, see Deleuze (2003a, pp. 42–3).

  10. The list of scholars who argue for the ontological status of differentials as fictions or ideas is long: Schrader (1983, p. 704); Baumanns (1974, p. 55); Cassirer (1920, p. 102, 104, 123); Vaihinger (1911, pp. 110–2, 269, 273–4, 282); Atlas (1964, p. 118). Others argue that differentials have to be defined as real relations or laws of the understanding: Bergman (1967, p. 60, 67); Engstler (1990, p. 23, 143).

  11. Deleuze (1994, p. 193).

  12. Maimon (2010, p. 75, 80). References to passages from the Essay are to the page numbers of the German original edition, marked at the top of each page of the translation.

  13. Maimon (2010, p. 103).

  14. Maimon (2010, p. 33).

  15. Nick Midgley, in Maimon (2010, p. xlvi).

  16. See for instance, Deleuze (1983), p. 52n); (1994, p. 170, 173–4, 192–3, 310, 324, 326); (1993, p. 89); (2003b, p. 61); Seminar on Kant of 14 March 1978 (transcripts of Deleuze’s seminars are available on-line at http://www.webdeleuze.com/sommaire.html).

References

  • Atlas, Samuel. 1964. From critical to speculative idealism. The Philosophy of Solomon Maimon. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumanns, Peter. 1974. Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre. Probleme ihres Anfangs. Bonn.

  • Beiser, Frederick C. 1987. The fate of reason–German philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, Frederick C. 2002. German idealism: The struggle against subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, Samuel Hugo. 1967. The Philosophy of Solomon Maimon (trans: Jacobs, N.J.). Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.

  • Bransen, Jan. 1991. The Antinomy of thought: Maimonian skepticism and the relation between thoughts and objects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1920. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, vol. 3. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and philosophy (trans: Tomlinson, H.). London: Athlone Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (trans: Conley, T.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition (trans: Patton, P.). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2003a. Bergson’s Conception of Difference. In Desert Islands and other texts (1953–74), ed. David Lapoujade. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles (2003b) The Idea of Genesis in Kant’s Esthetics. In Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953–74), New York: Semiotext(e).

  • Engstler, Achim. 1990. Untersuchungen zum Idealismus Salomon Maimons. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1970. Letter to Reinhold, (March or April) 1795. In Gesamtausgabe; Briefwechsel 1793–5, vol. 3, ed. Reinhard Lauth and Hans Jacob. Frommann-Holzboog.

  • Franks, Paul. 2000. All or nothing: Systematicity and nihilism in Jacobi, Reinhold, and Maimon. In The Cambridge companion to German idealism, ed. K. Ameriks, 95–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Paul. 2003. Does post-Kantian skepticism exist? In Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism: Konzepte der Rationalität/Concepts of Rationality, ed. K. Ameriks, 141–163. New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, Gideon (ed.). 2003. Salomon Maimon: Rational dogmatist, empirical skeptic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéroult, Martial. (1929) La Philosophie transcendantale de Salomon Maimon. Paris.

  • Katz, Benzion. (1914) Die Erkenntnistheorie Salomon Maimons in ihrem Verhältnis zu Kant. Berlin.

  • Kuntze, Friedrich. 1912. Die Philosophie Salomon Maimons. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, Salomon. 1970. Philosophisches Wörterbuch (1791). In Collected Works, vol. 3, ed. Valerio Verra. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, Salomon. 2001. The Autobiography of Solomon Maimon (trans: Murray, J.C.). Chicaco: University of Illinois Press.

  • Maimon, Salomon. 2010. Essay on transcendental philosophy (trans: Midgley, N. et al.). New York: Continuum.

  • Schrader, Wolfgang H. 1983. Leibniz versus Kant—Die Leibniz-Rezeption Salomon Maimons. In: Leibniz. Werk und Wirkung. IV. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. ed. Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Hannover.

  • Vaihinger, Hans. 1911. Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Berlin.

  • Wegener, Richard. 1909. Die Transcendentalphilosophie S. Maimons. Diss. Rostock.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Voss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voss, D. Salomon Maimon: Essay on transcendental philosophy. Nick Midgley, Henry Somers-Hall, Alistair Welchman and Merten Reglitz (trans). Cont Philos Rev 44, 247–252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9179-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9179-4

Navigation