Abstract
The Units of Selection debate is a dispute about the causes of population change. I argue that it is generated by a particular `dynamical' interpretation of natural selection theory, according to which natural selection causes differential survival and reproduction of individuals and natural selection explanations cite these causes. I argue that the dynamical interpretation is mistaken and offer in outline an alternative, `statistical' interpretation, according to which natural selection theory is a fancy kind of `bookkeeping'. It explains by citing the statistical structure of a population and not by citing the causes of survival and reproduction. From the perspective of the statistical interpretation there is no substantive Units of Selection issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brandon, R.: 1982, 'The Levels of Selection', PSA 1, 315‐323.
Brandon, R.: 1988, 'The Levels of Selection: A Hierarchy of Interactors', in H. Plotkin (ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 5l‐71.
Brandon, R. and R. Burian (eds): 1984, Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dawkins R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Endler, J. A.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton Ecological Monographs, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Endler, J. A.: 1992, 'Natural Selection', in E. F. Keller and E. A Lloyd (eds), Key Words in Evolutionarv Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Hull, D.: 1981, 'The Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay', in R. Jensen and R. Harré (eds), The Philosophy of Evolution, pp. 23‐44
Lewontin, R. C.: 1970, 'The Units of Selection', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1, 1‐18.
Lloyd, E. A.: 1989, 'A Structural Approach to Defining Units of Selection', Philosophy of Science 56, 395‐418.
Lloyd, E. A.: 2001, '2001 Units and Levels of Selection: An Anatomy of the Units of Selection Debate', in Singh, Rama, S, Costas B, Krimbas, Diane Paul and John Beatty (eds), Thinking About Evolution: Historicalk, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, Volume II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 267‐291.
Mackie, J. A.: 1974, The Cement of the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Matthen, M. and A. Ariew: 2002, 'Two Ways if Thinking About Fitness' Journal of Philosophy 99, 55‐83.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1964, 'Group Selection and Kin Selection', Nature 201, 1145‐1147
Maynard Smith, J.: 1976, 'Group Selection', Quarterly Review of Biology 51, 277‐183.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1983, 'Models of Evolution', Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B, pp. 315‐325.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1986, An Introduction to Population Genetics.
Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mayr, E.: 1975, Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Magurran, A. E and A. Higham: 1988, 'Information Transfer Across Fish Shoals Under Predator Threat', Ethology 78, 153‐158
Mitchell, S.: 1987, 'Competing Units of Selection?: A Case of Symbiosis', Philosophy of Science 54, 351‐367.
Reeve, S and L. A. Dugatkin: 1994, 'Behavioural Ecology and Levels of selection', Advances in the Study of Behaviour 23, 101‐133
Sober, E.: 1980, 'Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism', Philosophy of Science 47, 350–383.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Sober, E. and D. S. Wilson: 1994, Recent philosophical work on the units of selection debate.
Sober, E. and D. S. Wilson: 1996, Unto Others, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA.
Sterelny, K.: 1996, 'The Return of the Gene', Philosophy of Science 63, 562–584.
Sterelny, K and P. Kitcher: 1988, 'The Return of the Gene', Journal of Philosophy 85, 339‐360.
Wade, M. J.: 1976, 'Group Selection Among Laboratory Populations of Tribolium', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 73, 4604‐4607.
Walsh, Denis, Tim Lewens and André Ariew: 2002, 'The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Drift', Philosophy of Science 69, 452‐473.
Waters, K.: 1991, 'Tempered Realism About the Force of Selection', Philosophy of Science 58, 553‐573.
Williams, G. C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Wilson, D. S.: 1975, 'A Theory of Group Selection', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72, 143‐146.
Wilson, D. S.: 1983, 'The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14, 159‐187.
Wimsatt, W.: 1980, 'Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy', in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 213‐259. Excerpt Reprinted in R. Brandon and R. Burian (eds), 1984 Genes, Organisms, Populaions: Controversies Over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 90‐108.
Wimsatt, W.: 1981, 'The Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-level Genome', PSA 1980 2, 122‐183.
Wright, S.: 1945, 'Tempo and Mode in Evolution: A Critical Review', Ecology 26, 415‐419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, D.M. Bookkeeping or Metaphysics? The Units of Selection Debate. Synthese 138, 337–361 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016426.73707.92
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016426.73707.92