Skip to main content
Log in

In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I analyse the conceptual and mathematical foundations of Lagrangian quantum field theory (QFT) (that is, the ‘naive’ (QFT) used in mainstream physics, as opposed to algebraic quantum field theory). The objective is to see whether Lagrangian (QFT) has a sufficiently firm conceptual and mathematical basis to be a legitimate object of foundational study, or whether it is too ill-defined. The analysis covers renormalisation and infinities, inequivalent representations, and the concept of localised states; the conclusion is that Lagrangian QFT (at least as described here) is a perfectly respectable physical theory, albeit somewhat different in certain respects from most of those studied in foundational work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Abraham J. Marsden (1978) Foundations of Mechanics EditionNumber2 Benjamin/Cummings Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Albert (1992) Quantum mechanics and experience Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachussets

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Albert B. Loewer (1990) ‘Wanted Dead or Alive: Two Attempts to Solve Schrödinger’s Paradox’ A. Fine M. Forbes L. Wessels (Eds) Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association NumberInSeriesVol. 1. Philosophy of Science Association East Lansing, Michigan 277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Albert B. Loewer (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Measurement Problem: Some “Solutions”’ Synthese 86 87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Albert B. Loewer (1996) ‘Tails of Schrödinger’s Cat’ R. Clifton (Eds) Perspectives on Quantum Reality Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Barbour (1994a) ArticleTitle‘The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: I The Evidence from the Classical Theory’ Classical and Quantum Gravity 11 2853–2873 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0264-9381/11/12/005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Barbour (1994b) ArticleTitle‘The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: II. The Appearence of Dynamics in Static Configurations’ Classical and Quantum Gravity 11 2875–2897 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0264-9381/11/12/006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Barbour (1999) The End of Time Weidenfeld and Nicholson London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bassi G. Ghirardi (1999) ArticleTitle‘More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 719–734 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/50.4.719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. H. Bennett G. Brassard R. Jozsa A. Peres W. K. Wootters (1993) ArticleTitle‘Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels’ Physical Review Letters 70 1895–1898 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Binney N. J. Dowrick A. J. Fisher M. E. J. Newman (1992) The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalisation Group Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, D.: 2000, ‘Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: a Status Report’, Plenary talk given at the XIIIth International Conference on Mathematical Physics, London. Available online at http://xxx.arxiv.org/math-ph/0011044.

  • T.Y. Cao (1997) Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Carlip (1998) Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Castellani (2002) ArticleTitle‘Reduction, Emergence, and Effective Field Theories’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 251–267 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00003-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Clifton H. Halvorson (2001) ArticleTitle‘Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 1–31 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00033-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Clifton B. Monton (1999) ArticleTitle‘Losing your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 697–717 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/50.4.697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Clifton B. Monton (2000) ArticleTitle‘Counting Marbles with ‘Accessible’ Mass Density: a reply to Bassi and Ghirardi’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 155–164 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/51.1.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1991, ‘Real Patterns’, Journal of Philosophy 87, 27-51. Reprinted in Brainchildren, D. Dennett, Penguin, London, 1998, pp. 95-120.

  • D. Deutsch (1984) ‘Towards a Quantum Theory without ‘Quantization” S. Christensen (Eds) Quantum Theory of Gravity: essays in honour of Bryce S DeWitt. Adam Hilger Ltd. Bristol 421–430

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Deutsch (1985) ArticleTitle‘Quantum Theory as a Universal Physical Theory’ International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24 IssueID1 1–41 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00670071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. and P. Hayden: 2000, ‘Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A456, 1759-1774. Available online at http://www.arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9906007.

  • D. Dieks P. E. Vermaas (Eds) (1998) The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • H. B. Enderton (1977) Elements of Set Theory Academic Press San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Fredenhagen (1985) ArticleTitle‘A Remark on the Cluster Theorem’ Communications in Mathematical Physics 97 461–463 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01213409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Ghirardi A. Bassi (1999) ArticleTitle‘Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply That Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 705–720 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/50.1.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Ghirardi A. Rimini T. Weber (1986) ArticleTitle‘Unified Dynamics for Micro and Macro Systems’ Physical Review D 34 470–491 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Haag (1996) Local Quantum Theory: Fields, Particles, Algebras Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Halvorson R. Clifton (2002) ArticleTitle‘No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?’ Philosophy of Science 69 1–28 Occurrence Handle10.1086/338939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Hartmann (2001) ArticleTitle‘Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 267–304 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00005-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. A. Hegerfeldt (1998a) ‘Causality, Particle Localization and Positivity of the Energy’ A. Böhm (Eds) Irreversibility and Causality Springer New York 238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • G. A. Hegerfeldt (1998b) ArticleTitle‘Instantaneous Spreading and Einstein Causality’ Annalen der Physik 7 716–725 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199812)7:7/8<716::AID-ANDP716>3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Knight (1961) ArticleTitle‘Strict Localisation in Quantum Field Theory’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 2 459 Occurrence Handle10.1063/1.1703731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ladyman (1998) ArticleTitle‘What is Structural Realism’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29 409–424 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. J. Lewis (1997) ArticleTitle‘Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 313–328 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/48.3.313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. L. Licht (1963) ArticleTitle‘Strict Localization’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 4 1443–1447 Occurrence Handle10.1063/1.1703925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Marsden T. S. Ratiu (1994) Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Morrison (1962) The Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems Gordon and Breach Science Publishers New York

    Google Scholar 

  • T. D. Newton E. P. Wigner (1949) ArticleTitle‘Localized States for Elementary Particle Physics’ Reviews of Modern Physics 21 400 Occurrence Handle10.1103/RevModPhys.21.400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Pearle (1989) ArticleTitle‘Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization’ Physical Review A 39 IssueID5 2277–2289 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Peskin D. V. Schroeder (1995) An introduction to Quantum Field Theory Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Psillos (1995) ArticleTitle‘Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds?’ Dialectica 49 15–46 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1746-8361.1995.tb00113.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Redhead (1995) ArticleTitle‘More Ado about Nothing’ Foundations of Physics 25 123 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Reeh S. Schlieder (1961) ArticleTitle‘Bemerkungen zur Unitäräquivalenz von Lorentzinvarianten Feldern’ Nuovo Cimento 22 1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Reutsche, L.: 1998, ‘How Close is ‘Close Enough’?’, in Dieks and Vermaas (1998), pp. 223-240.

  • Ross, D., J. Ladyman, D. Spurrett, and J. Collier: Every Thing Must Go, Oxford University Press, 2006, Forthcoming.

  • I. Segal (1964) ‘Quantum Fields and Analysis in the Solution Manifolds of Differential Equations’ W. Martin I. Segal (Eds) Analysis in Function Space MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusets

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Strocchi A.S. Wightman (1976) Journal of Mathematical Physics 17 1930 Occurrence Handle10.1063/1.522818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Teller (1984) ArticleTitle‘The Projection Postulate: a New Perspective’ Philosophy of Science 51 369–395 Occurrence Handle10.1086/289190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. C. Fraassen Particlevan (1991) Quantum Mechanics Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Wald (1984) General Relativity University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Wald (1994) Quantum Mechanics on Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D.: 2001a, ‘Emergence of Particles from Bosonic Quantum Field Theory’, Forthcoming in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. Available online at http://xxx.arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112149 or from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu.

  • Wallace, D.: 2001b, ‘Implications of Quantum Theory in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics’, Available online from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu.

  • Wallace, D.: 2003, ‘Everett and Structure’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 87-105. Available online at http://xxx.arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0107144 or from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu.

  • K. G. Wilson J. Kogut (1974) ArticleTitle‘The Renormalization Group and the ε Expansion’ Physics Reports 12C 75–200 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. M. J. Woodhouse (1991) Geometric Quantization Oxford Science Publications Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1989, ‘Structural Realism: the Best of Both Worlds’, Dialectica 43, 99-124. Reprinted in The Philosophy of Science, D. Papineau (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 139-165.

  • Zurek, W. H.: 1998, ‘Decoherence, Chaos, Quantum-Classical Correspondence, and the Algorithmic Arrow of Time’, Phys. Scripta T76, 186-198. Available online at http://xxx.arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9802054.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, D. In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory. Synthese 151, 33–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6248-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6248-9

Keywords

Navigation