Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 13a))

  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

What do we want from a theory of rational decision making? At the very least we want some guidelines on how, rationally, we ought to make our decisions and a justification of the claim that decisions insofar as they are made in accordance with those guidelines are rational. This presupposes some account of rationality or, alternatively, offers the theory as a partial account of rationality. It is this larger problem, the giving of a justified account of rationality, which is at any rate the central problem. A particular theory of rational decision is of interest only to the extent that it either contributes to or is justified in terms of such a general account of rationality. Thus my interest here in the theory of decision is in terms of the contribution that such a theory might make towards a general, robust theory of rationality. Such a general theory will at the very least include not only a theory of rational choice among alternatives but also a theory of rational beliefs and of rational values, and, as I shall suggest, also a theory of rational design. Such a general, robust theory of rationality is of interest for the contribution that it could make towards a number of different areas of concern: an account of individual and social abberation as well as an account of sane individual actions and social interractions, to an account of educational and therapeutic aims, and as I propose to argue on another occasion to a general ‘cognitive’ theory of psychology.

An even more preliminary account of some of this material was presented at the Colloquium on the Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory held at London, Ontario in May of 1975. Much of my original reflection on the issues raised here was carried out during a very pleasant year as a Research Fellow at the Program for Humanities, Science and Technology at Cornell University. Bill Wimsatt with whom I there shared an office and a long drive to Ontario provided welcome stimulation. Some related considerations appear in my ‘Good Desires’ and discussions in Max Black (ed.), Problems of Choice and Decision, Cornell University Program on Science, Technology and Society,1975. I have learned much of the relevance from the work of L.R.Hubbard.See especially his Organizational Executive Course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ilmar Waldner, ‘The Empirical Meaningfulness of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons’, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXIX, No. 4, February 24, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ilmar Waldner, ‘Bare Preference and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons’, Theory and Decision Vol. V, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard Jeffrey, ‘Preference Among Preferences’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXII, No. 13, July 18, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harry Frankfurt, ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXVIII, No. 1, January 14, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelvin Lancaster, Consumer Demand: A New Approach, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Braybrooke, ‘From Economics to Aesthetics: The Rectification of Preferences’, Nous Vol. 8, No. 1, March 1974, with whose approach I have much sympathy and from whom I first learned of Lancaster’s work.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Braybrooke and Charles E. Lindblom, A Strategy of Decision, Free Press, 1963, for an interesring discussion of what they call a ‘Disjointed Incrementalist’ strategy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waldner, I. (1978). Prolegomena to a Theory of Rational Motives. In: Hooker, C.A., Leach, J.J., >McClennen, E.F. (eds) Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 13a. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9789-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9789-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9791-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9789-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics