Skip to main content
Log in

The Place of Dialogue Theory in Logic, Computer Science and Communication Studies

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dialogue theory, although it has ancient roots, was put forward in the 1970s in logic as astructure that can be useful for helping to evaluate argumentation and informal fallacies.Recently, however, it has been taken up as a broader subject of investigation in computerscience. This paper surveys both the historical and philosophical background of dialoguetheory and the latest research initiatives on dialogue theory in computer science. The main components of dialogue theory are briefly explained. Included is a classification of the main types of dialogue that, it is argued, should provide the central focus for studying many important dialogue contexts in specific cases. Following these three surveys, a concluding prediction is made about the direction dialogue theory is likely to take in the next century, especially in relation to the growing field of communication studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, Else M. and Erik C.W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Lauri: 1983, Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Robert T.: 1999, 'Communication Theory as a Field', Communication Theory, to appear.

  • Grice, J. Paul: 1975, 'Logic and Conversation', in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman (eds), The Logic of Grammar, Encino, CA, pp. 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Charles L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Charles L.: 1971, 'Mathematical Models of Dialogue', Theoria 37, 130–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Marc D.: 1996, The Evolution of Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1979, 'Information-Seeking Dialogues: A Model', Erkenntnis 38, 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1992, 'The Interrogative Model of Inquiry as a General Theory of Argumentation', Communication and Cognition 25, 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1993, 'Socratic Questioning, Logic and Rhetoric', Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1(184), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1995, 'The Games of Logic and the Games of Inquiry', Dialectica 49, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka: 1982, 'Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Toward a Theory of Information-Seeking Through Questioning', in E. M. Barth and J. L. Martens (eds), Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair: 1985, 'Informal Logic: The Past Five Years', American Philosophical Quarterly 22, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestler, Jeffrey L.: 1982, Questioning Techniques and Tactics, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, J. D.: 1993, Neuromotor Mechanisms in Human Communication, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodder, Arno R.: 1998, Dialaw: On Legal Justification and Dialog Games, Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht University.

  • Mackenzie, Jim: 1981, 'The Dialectics of Logic', Logique et Analyse 94, 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Jim: 1990, 'Four Dialogue Systems', Studia Logica 49, 567–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Chris: 1998, 'Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication', in Y. Demazeau (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, IEEE Press, pp. 246–253.

  • Rescher, Nicholas: 1977, Dialectics, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Richard: 1953, Plato's Earlier Dialectic, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Stuart and Peter Norvig: 1995, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude E. and Warren Weaver: 1972, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Barry G.: 1992, Critiquing Human Error: A Knowledge Based Human-Computer Collaboration Approach, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst, Speech Acts in Communicative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht.

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1987, 'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective', Argumentation 1, 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

  • Vreeswijk, Gerard A. W.: 1997, 'Abstract Argumentation Systems', Artificial Intelligence 90, 225–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1989, Question-Reply Argumentation, Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas: 1998, The New Dialectic, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N. and Erik C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue, Albany, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walton, D. The Place of Dialogue Theory in Logic, Computer Science and Communication Studies. Synthese 123, 327–346 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005237527730

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005237527730

Keywords

Navigation