Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Spatialisation of Disease: Foucualt and Evidence-based Medicine (EBM)

  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I draw on the French philosopher Michel Foucault for a viewpoint on aspects of EBM. This means that I develop his idea of the spaces occupied by disease. I give much of the paper to only one of these spaces, the space of perception of disease, in order to major on the medical gaze, one of Foucault’s best-known contributions to the philosophy of medicine. As I explain what I mean by each of the spaces of disease, I configure EBM into this space. The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Evidence-based clinical practice requires integration of individual clinical expertise and patient preferences with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and consideration of available resources. EBM can be considered a subcategory of evidence-based healthcare, which also includes other branches of health-care practice such as evidence-based nursing or evidence-based physiotherapy. EBM subcategories include evidence-based surgery and evidence-based cardiology (Guyatt et al. 2008, 783).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Crepitations: this word is onomatopoeic for fine crackles heard with a stethoscope, usually low down at the back of one or two lungs. Their interpretation can be complex, two common causes being pneumonia and left ventricular failure.

  2. “The sign no longer speaks the natural language of disease; it assumes shape and value only within the questions posed by medical investigation. There is nothing, therefore, to prevent it being solicited and almost fabricated by medical investigation. It is no longer that which is spontaneously stated by the disease itself; it is the meeting point of the gestures of research and the sick organism” (Foucault 1994, 162).

  3. I am aware that my treatment of Foucault and reason is superficial. This can be seen in the following quote, taken from Rabinow (1991, 13): “But questions—both philosophical and political—remain about the exact status of reason in Foucault’s work. He seems to set himself close to, but apart from, a line of thinkers stretching from Max Weber to Martin Heidegger through Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Each of these men, in different ways, recognised both a centrality and a danger in the processes of increasing rationalisation and technological development of the world. Each also differentiated between types of reason of thinking—instrumental, substantive, formal, critical etc—and attempted to separate out those dimensions and consequences of rational activity which were pernicious and those which in some form or other could serve as instruments of resisting or overcoming the destructive functioning of reason in Western culture.”

References

  • Ahmadi-Abhari, S., A. Soltani, and F. Hosseinpanah. 2008. Knowledge and attitudes of trainee physicians regarding evidence-based medicine: A questionnaire survey in Tehran, Iran. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14: 775–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alfutures.com. Patient-centered care 2015: Scenarios, vision, goals & next steps, © The Picker Institute. http://www.altfutures.com/pubs/Picker%20Final%20Report%20May%2014%202004.pdf (Accessed 23 December 2009).

  • Campbell, C.S. 1998. Religion and moral meaning in bioethics. In On moral medicine: Theological perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd ed, ed. S.E. Lammers and A. Verhey, 23–30. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, J. 2006. Food, morals and meaning: The pleasure and anxiety of eating. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Dib, R.P., A.N. Atallah, and R.B. Andriolo. 2007. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. Journal of Evaluation of Clinical Practice 13: 689–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1991. Ethics; Essentials works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 1. Ed. Paul Rabinow. London: Penguin.

  • Foucault, M. 1994. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G. 2004. Bioethics in the clinic: Hippocratic reflections. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G., D. Rennie, M.O. Meade, and D.J. Cook. 2008. Users’ Guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komesaroff, P. 2008. Experiments in love and death: Medicine, postmodernism, microethics and the body. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., M. Loughlin, and A. Polychronis. 2008. Evidnece-based healthcare, clinical knowledge and the rise of personalised medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14(5): 621–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, O.S., L.M. Bachmann, and J. Steurer. 2008. Towards scientific medicine: An information-age outlook. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14: 771–774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Hazelton Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, B.H. The Spatialisation of Disease: Foucualt and Evidence-based Medicine (EBM). Bioethical Inquiry 7, 31–42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9216-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9216-8

Keywords

Navigation