For the physical world, the four dimensions are natural. But for the mind, there is no such natural coordinate system; time is the only natural frame of reference.
Gödel, conversation on 15.3.72
Abstract
The essay centers on Gödel's views on the place of our intuitive concept of time in philosophy and in physics. It presents my interpretation of his work on the theory of relativity, his observations on the relationship between Einstein's theory and Kantian philosophy, as well as some of the scattered remarks in his conversations with me in the seventies — namely, those on the philosophies of Leibniz, Hegel and Husserl — as a successor of Kant — in relation to their conceptions of time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, Jeremy: 1991,Quantum Profiles, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bollert, Karl: 1921,Einstein's Relativitätstheorie und ihre Stellug im System der Gesamterfahrung, Verlag von Theodor Steinkopff, Dresden und Leibzig.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1963, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court Press, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 37–63.
Edwards, Paul (ed.): 1967,Encyclopedia of Philosophy, McMillan, London and New York.
Einstein, Albert, P. Podolsky and N. Rosen: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?’Physical Reviews 47, 777–80.
Gödel, Kurt: 1949, ‘An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations’,Reviews of Modern Physics 21, 447–50. Reprinted in Gödel 1990, pp. 190–8.
Gödel, Kurt: 1949a, ‘A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, pp. 555–62. Reprinted in Gödel 1990, pp. 202–7.
Gödel, Kurt: 1952, ‘Rotating Universes in General Relativity Theory’,Proc. Int. Cong. Mathematicians; Cambridge, Mass. 1950, pp. 175–81. Reprinted in Gödel 1990, pp. 208–16.
Gödel, Kurt: 1990,Collected Works, vol. 2, S. Feferman and others (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York.
Gödel, Kurt: (1946–49), ‘Some Observations About the Relationship Between Theory of Relativity and Kantian Philosophy’, manuscripts A, B, and C, of which B and C are scheduled to be published in Gödel 1994. — I am grateful to the Institute for Advanced Study for permission to use these and the next manuscripts.
Gödel, Kurt: 1949b,Lecture on Rotating Universes, to be published in Gödel 1995.
Gödel, Kurt: 1995,Collected Works, vol. 3, S. Feferman and others (eds.), Oxford University Press, to appear.
Husserl, Edmund: 1966,Zur Phänomenologie des Inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917), Rudolf Boehm (ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Holland.
Kant, Immanuel: 1965,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. K. Smith, St. Martin's Press, New York.
Kant, Immanuel: 1970,Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. James Ellington, Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis and New York.
Loemker, Leroy E. (ed.): 1969,Philosophical Papers and Letters of Leibniz, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Rucker, Rudy: 1982,Infinity and the Mind, Birkhäuser, Boston.
Stein, Howard: 1990,Introductory Note to Gödel 1949a, Gödel 1990, pp. 199–201.
Stein, Howard: 1995,Introductory Note to Gödel (1946–49), to appear in Gödel 1995.
Wang, Hao: 1974,From Mathematics to Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Wang, Hao: 1987,Reflections on Kurt Gödel, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Yourgrau, Palle: 1991,The Disappearance of Time — Kurt Gödel and the Idealistic Tradition in Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H. Time in philosophy and in physics: From Kant and Einstein to Gödel. Synthese 102, 215–234 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089801
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089801