Abstract
The knowledge use field is in a state of conceptual disarray that has contributed to problems in the dissemination and use of knowledge. Examining the nature of knowledge in a critical realist epistemology results in a reconceptualization of knowledge use from a postmodern critical theorist perspective. This theory takes as its focus the study of research, dissemination, and use as cultural structure, ritual, and ideology; and addresses concerns about knowledge use by articulating a conceptual frame-work that triangulates among issues related to knowledge construction, power and action, and ethics and ideology, as integral to any concept of knowledge and its use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985).Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bernstein, R. (1978).The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Brannen, M. (1992). Bwana Mickey: Constructing cultural consumption at Tokyo Disneyland. In Tobin, J. (Ed.)Remade in Japan: Everyday Life and Consumer Taste in a Changing Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bredo, E., & Feinberg, W. (Eds.). (1982).Knowledge and values in social and educational research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986).Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993).Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cox, P. (1994).Reevaluating evaluation: Returning evaluation to those who need to learn from it. Unpublished manuscript.
Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences.Writing and Difference. Trans., Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fendler, L., & Popkewitz, T. (1993). (Re)constituting critical traditions.Educational Researcher, 22(6), 24–26.
Fetterman, D. (1993).Empowerment evaluation. Presidential address at the American Evaluation Association annual meeting, Dallas.
Foucault, M. (1984).Politics and ethics: An interview. Unpublished manuscript.
Foucault, M. (1971). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.). (1997).Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Giarelli, J. (1992). Critical theory and educational research: An introduction.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(1), 3–5.
Giroux, H. (1992).Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
Gouldner, A. (1982). Sociology: Contradictions and intrastructure. In Bredo, E., & Feinberg, W. (Eds.),Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Green, J. (1983). Research on teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. In Gordon, E. (Ed.),Review of Research in Education, 10, 151–252. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Habermas, J. (1970). On systematically distorted communication.Inquiry, 13, 205–218.
Habermas, J. (1971).Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, J. (1979). Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism.Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.
Haraway, D. (1989). Situated knowledge: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Havelock, R. (1969).Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Henry, C., & Kemmis, S. (1986).Action research in curriculum: A course guide. Deakin University.
Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens.Knowledge: Creation, Dissemination, Utilization, 4(4), 478–511.
Huberman, M. (1989). Predicting conceptual effects in research utilization: Looking with both eyes.Knowledge in Society, 2(3), 6–24.
Jay, M. (1973).The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfort School and the Institute of Social Research. Boston: Little Brown.
Kuhn, T. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lather, P. (1988).Ideology and methodological attitude. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans.
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967).Organization and environment. Irwin.
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision in social change. In Maccoby, E., Newcomb, T., & Hartley, E. (Eds.)Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Louis, K., Dentler, R., Kell, D. (1981).Putting knowledge to work: Issues in educational dissemination. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Maxwell, J., & Lincoln, Y. (1990). Methodology and epistemology: A dialogue.Harvard Education Review, 60(4), 497–512.
Maxwell, J. (1993).Qualitative research design. Unpublished manuscript.
McLaren, P. (1992). Collisions with otherness: “Traveling” theory, post-colonial criticism, and the politics of ethnographic practice—the mission of the wounded ethnographer.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(1), 77–92.
Miller, J. (1990).Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. New York: SUNY Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1979).The structure of organizations: A synthesis of research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Oja, S., & Smulyan, L. (1989).Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. The Falmer Press.
Patten, M. (1986).Utilization focused evaluation, 2nd Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Press.
Rabinow, P. (Eds.), (1984).The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Rabinow, P., & Dreyfus, H. (Eds.). (1983).Michael Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schneier, L. (1991). Respondent in, Duckworth, E.,Teaching and Research in One: Extended Clinical Interviewing. Invited Address, the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago.
Sirotnik, K. (1991). The school as the center of change. In Sergiovani & Moore (Eds.),Schooling for Tomorrow: Directing Reforms to Issues that Count. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical.Curriculum and Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.
Watkins, J. (1989). Collaborative ethnographic evaluation in a complex organization. Presentation for the Committee on Ethnographic Evaluation, Council on Anthropology in Education, the American Anthropological Association annual meeting, Washington, D.C.
Watkins, J. (1992). Critical friends in the fray: An experiment in applying critical ethnography to school restructuring. In, Hess, G. A. (Ed.).Empowering Teachers and Parents: School Restructuring Through the Eyes of Anthropologists. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Watkins, J. (1993).Ethnographic evaluation: Problems in praxis. Invited panel discussion, Committee on Ethnographic Evaluation, Council on Anthropology in Education, the American Anthropological Association annual meeting, Washington, DC.
Weick, K. (1979).The social psychology of organizing, 2nd Ed. New York: Random House.
Weiss, C. (1975). Evaluation research in the political context In Guttentag, M., & Struening, E. (Eds.).Handbook of Evaluation Research (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Press.
Wilcox, K. (1982). Ethnography as a methodology and its applications to the study of schooling: A review. In Spindler, G. (Ed.).Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
John M. Watkins is a private consultant atInquiry and Learning for Change. His primary work is in the area of action research and critical inquiry with schools and communities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, J.M. A postmodern critical theory of research use. Knowledge and Policy 7, 55–77 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696292
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696292