Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:27:13.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should philosophy replace religious education? Reflections following brendan larvor's article ‘Tu Quoque, archbishop’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Brenda Watson
Get access

Abstract

In Think, Issue 7, Brendan Larvor took the Archbishop of Canterbury to task for suggesting that atheism and humanism should not be taught in schools alongside the major faiths. Here, Brenda Watson defends the Archbishop's position.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 3 , Issue 9 , Spring 2005 , pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Flew, A., Thinking About Social thinking: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985) p. 40.Google Scholar

2 Bausor, J. and Poole, M., ‘Science-and-religion in the Agreed Syllabuses — An Investigation and Some Suggestions’, British Journal of Religious Education 25:1 (2003) pp. 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar