Skip to main content
Log in

Revelation and Transparency in Colour Vision Refuted: A Case Oo Mind/Brain Identity and Another Bridge over the Explanatory Gap

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russell (1912) and others have argued that the real nature of colour is transparentto us in colour vision. It's nature is fully revealed to us and no further knowledgeis theoretically possible. This is the doctrine of “revelation”. Two-dimensionalFourier analyses of coloured checkerboards have shown that apparently simple,monadic, colours can be based on quite different physical mechanisms. Experimentswith the McCollough effect on different types of checkerboards have shown thatidentical colours can have energy at the quite different orientations of Fourierharmonic components but no energy at the edges of the checkerboards, thusrefuting revelation. It is concluded that this effect is not explained by a superveniencedispositional account of colour as proposed by McGinn (1996). It was argued that theMcCollough effect in checkerboards was an example of a local mind/body reduction(Kim 1993), by which the different characteristics of identical colours falsifies revelation. This reduction being based on both physical and neurological mechanisms led to a clear explanation of the perceive phenomenal effects and thus laid a small bridge over the explanatory gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D. M. and N. Malcolm: 1984, Consciousness & Causality, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artola, A., S. Brocher, and W. Singer: 1990, ‘Different Voltage-Dependent Thresholds for Inducing Long-term Depression and Long-term Potentiation in Slices of Rat Visual Cortex’, Nature 347, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. L., T. J. Teyler, and H. Taizhen: 1989, ‘Induction of LTP in Rat Primary Visual Cortex: Tetanus Parameter’, Brain Research 481, 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P. A. and J. D. Velleman: 1989, ‘Colour as a Secondary Quality’, Mind 98, 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. H., P. F. Chapman, E. W. Kairiss, and C. L. Keenan: 1988, ‘Long-term Synaptic Potentiation’, Science 242, 724–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.: 1993, ‘A Simple View of Colour’, in A. Byrne and D. R. Hilbert (eds), Readings on Color, Volume 1: The Philosophy of Color, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzfeldt, O. D. and P. Heggelund: 1975, ‘Neural Plasticity in Visual Cortex of Adult Cats after Exposure to Visual Patterns’, Science 188, 1025–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valois, K. K., R. L. De Valois, and E. W. Yund: 1979, ‘Responses of Striate Cortex Cells to Grating and Checkerboard Patterns’, Journal of Physiology 291, 483–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B. and A. Wigstrom: 1988, ‘Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Long-term Potentiation’, Trends in Neuroscience 11, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, G.: 1991, ‘Color and the Mind-body Problem’, Review of Metaphysics 45, 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T.: 1993, ‘From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World’, Mind 102, 555–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. C.: 1996, ‘The Primary Quality View of Color’, in J. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectrives, Metaphysics 10, 199–219.

  • Jackson, F. C. and R. Pargetter: 1987, ‘An Objectivist's Guide to Subjectivism about Colour’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 41, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1992, ‘How to Speak of the Colors’, Philosophical Studies 68, 221–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1996, ‘Is the External World Visible?’, in E. Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Philosophical Issues 7, 185–198.

  • Kelly, D. H.: 1976, ‘Pattern Detection and the Two-dimensional Fourier Transform: Flickering Checkerboards and Chromatic Mechanisms’, Vision Research 16, 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1993, Supervenience and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu, Y., K. Fujii, H. Sakaguchi, and K. Toyama: 1988, ‘Long-term Potentiation of Synaptic Transmission in Kitten Visual Cortex’, Journal of Neurophysiology 59, 124–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.: 1983, ‘Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1997, ‘Naming the Colours’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, C.: 1965, ‘Color Adaptation of Edge-detectors in the Human Visual System’, Science 149, 1113–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1996, ‘Another Look at Color’, The Journal of Philosophy 93, 537–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, C. R.: 1978, ‘Color Vision Mechanisms in Monkey Striate Cortex: Simple Cells with Dual Opponent-color Receptive Fields’, Journal of Neurophysiology 41. 1233–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassau, K.: 1983, The Physics and Chemistry of Color, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1980, ‘The Nature of Mental States’, in N. Block, (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Volume One, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. W.: 1999, ‘The Appearance and Nature of Color’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 37, 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J.: 1970, ‘Could Mental States be Brain Processes?’, in C. V. Borst (ed.), The Mind/Brain Identity Theory, MacMillan, London, pp. 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1959, 'Sensations and Brain Processes, Philosophical Review, LXVIII, 141–156. Reprinted in C. V. Borst (ed.), The Mind/Brain Identity Theory, MacMillan, London, 1970, pp. 52-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.: 1993, ‘Colour, Transparency, Mind-independence’, in J. Haldane and C. Wright (eds), Reality, Representatives and Projection, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G.: 1989, ‘“Red 1 and Red”’, Synthese 78, 193–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. R.: 2002a, ‘A Case of Mind/brain Identity: One Small Bridge for the Explanatory Gap’, Synthese 131, 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. R.: 2002b, ‘Wavelength Theory of Colour Strikes Back: The Return of the Physical’, Synthese 132, 303–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. R., B. Crassini, and K. Willenberg: 1987, ‘Simultaneous Color Contrast from McCollough Effects is Spatially Contingent’, Perception and Psychophysics 41, 402–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. R., R. H. Day, and K. Willenberg: 1988, ‘Orientation-Contingent-Color Aftereffects are Determined by Real Color, not Induced Color’, Perception and Psychophysics 44, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. R., R. H. Day, O. Gilles, and B. Crassini: 1992, ‘Spatial-frequency-contingent Aftereffects: Adaptation with Two-dimensional Stimulus Patterns’, Perception and Psychophysics 51, 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webster, W. Revelation and Transparency in Colour Vision Refuted: A Case Oo Mind/Brain Identity and Another Bridge over the Explanatory Gap. Synthese 133, 419–439 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021294209237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021294209237

Keywords

Navigation