Skip to main content
Log in

A review of Lorenzo Magnani, 2000, Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Eemeren, F. van, Grootendorst, R. & Henkemans, F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1999). Manifest rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (1993). Critical thinking: The great debate. Educational Theory, 43(1), 99-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (1994). Informal logic and applied epistemology. In R. Johnson & A. Blair (eds), New essays in informal logic (pp. 141–160), Windsor: Informal Logic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinstein, M. A review of Lorenzo Magnani, 2000, Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation . Studies in Philosophy and Education 23, 283–292 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPED.0000028330.83259.25

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPED.0000028330.83259.25

Navigation