Abstract
Frege is celebrated as an arch-Platonist and arch-realist. He is renowned for claiming that truths of arithmetic are eternally true and independent of us, our judgments and our thoughts; that there is a ‘third realm’ containing nonphysical objects that are not ideas. Until recently, there were few attempts to explicate these renowned claims, for most philosophers thought the clarity of Frege's prose rendered explication unnecessary. But the last ten years have seen the publication of several revisionist interpretations of Frege's writings — interpretations on which these claims receive a very different reading. In ‘Frege on Knowing the Third Realm’, Tyler Burge attempts to undermine this trend. Burge argues that Frege is the very Platonist most have thought him — that revisionist interpretations of Frege's Platonism, mine among them, run afoul of the words on Frege's pages. This paper is a response to Burge's criticisms. I argue that my interpretation is more faithful than Burge's to Frege's texts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burge, T.: 1992, ‘Frege on Knowing the Third Realm’,Mind 101, 633–50.
Frege, G.: 1884,Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, W. Koebner, Breslau (1968,Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. by J. L. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Evanston).
Frege, G.: 1891a,Funktion und Begriff, Herman Pohle, Jena (‘Function and Concept’, in Frege (1984), pp. 137–56).
Frege, G.: 1891b, ‘Über das Trägheitsgesetz’,Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 98, 145–61 (‘On the Law of Inertia’, in Frege (1984) pp. 123–36).
Frege, G.: 1892, ‘Über Begriff und Gegenstand’,Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschafeliche Philosophie, 16, pp. 192–205 (‘On Concept and Object’, in Frege (1984), pp. 182–94).
Frege, G.: 1894, Rezension von: E. Husserl,Philosophie der Arithmetik, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103, 313–32 (Review of E. G. Husserl,Philosophie der Arithmetik I, in Frege (1984), pp. 195–209).
Frege, G.: 1906, ‘Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie’,Jahresberichte der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15, 293–309, 377–403, 423–30 (‘On the Foundations of Geometry’, in Frege (1984), pp. 273–84, 293–341).
Frege, G.: 1918a, ‘Der Gedanke’,Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1, 58–77 (‘Thoughts’, in Frege (1984), pp. 351–72).
Frege, G.: 1918b, ‘Die Verneinung’,Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1, 143–57 (‘Negation’, in Frege (1984), pp. 373–89).
Frege, G.: 1962,Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Georg Olms, Hildesheim. (The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, volume 1, introduction, Sections 0–52, Appendix I, and Appendix II in Frege (1964), volume 2, Sections 56–67, 86–137, 139–44, 146–7 in Frege (1980b)).
Frege, G.: 1964,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, in M. Furth (trans. and ed.), University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Frege, G.: 1976,Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.
Frege, G.: 1979,Posthumous Writings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Frege, G.: 1980a,Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Frege, G.: 1980b,Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 3rd ed., P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey.
Frege, G.: 1983,Nachgelassene Schriften, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.
Frege, G.: 1984,Collected Papers, Brian McGuinness (ed.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1983, ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, pp. 343–77.
Ricketts, T.: 1986, ‘Objectivity and Objecthood: Frege's Metaphysics of Judgement’, in Leila Haaparanta and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.),Frege Synthesized, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 65–95.
Sluga, H.: 1980,Gottlob Frege, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Weiner, J.: 1990,Frege in Perspective, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Weiner, J.: 1995, ‘Burge's Literal Interpretation of Frege’,Mind, forthcoming.
Weiner, J.: 1996, ‘Has Frege a Philosophy of Language?’, forthcoming inEarly Analytic Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky edited by W. W. Tait, Open Court Press.
Weiner, J.: ‘Theory and Elucidation: the End of the Age of Innocence’, unpublished.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiner, J. Realismbei Frege: Reply to Burge. Synthese 102, 363–382 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064121
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064121