Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
DiscussionUnderstanding is not simulating: a reply to Gibbs and Perlman
Section snippets
What does ELC predict?
Whether the evidence supports ELC depends on what predictions it makes relative to its competitors. G&P charge that I have a mistaken view about what sorts of experiential simulations ELC posits, which in turn leads me to misinterpret the evidence in favor of ELC. In the case of the action compatibility effect (ACE), I argued that it was hard to see why one would expect that sentences describing motion towards oneself would prime a motor response towards oneself, since the natural motion one
Further empirical evidence
As G&P note, recent neuroimaging studies provide converging evidence that seems to support ELC. That there is a link between motor activation and action verbs is indisputable. However, as Willems and Hagoort (2007) say in a recent review, it is difficult to tell whether this shows that motor representations are part of semantic representation proper or part of post-comprehension imagery processes.
Metaphor and nonliteral meaning
I will only make a few brief comments on metaphor and nonliteral meaning. Let me state that I’m not at all committed to the claim that on-line sentence comprehension first involves computing a “context-free, semantic, literal representation” (p. 10). On-line comprehension is always aimed at understanding in a particular context of use, and this purpose is plausibly best served by computing what is said by a speaker making an utterance, rather than the meaning of the sentence (Recanati, 2004).
The structure of the linguistic system
I’ll now briefly state what I take the relationship to be between the linguistic system(s) and the systems responsible for our abilities to produce simulations of various kinds. The TLC architecture is laid out in Figure 1.
Obviously, much detail is being suppressed in this analysis. Language can be either heard or seen, but this figure omits how we determine that auditory or visual input should be interpreted by the linguistic system. Similarly, the internal structure of the language
References (18)
- et al.
A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content
Journal of Physiology – Paris
(2008) - et al.
Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitecturally defined primary and premotor cortices
NeuroImage
(2008) - et al.
Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review
Brain and Language
(2007) - et al.
Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension
Cerebral Cortex
(2009) Metaphor in the mind: The cognition of metaphor
Philosophy Compass
(2006)- et al.
Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics
(2000) The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness
(1999)- et al.
Introduction to Montague Semantics
(1980) - et al.
Emotion simulation during language comprehension
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
(2007)
Cited by (1)
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology
2015, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology