Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can an SME Become a Global Corporate Citizen? Evidence from a Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global Corporate Citizenship (GCC) continues to become increasingly popular in large corporations. However, this concept has rarely been considered in small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). A case study of a Norwegian clothing company illustrates how GCC can be also applied to small companies. This case study also shows that SMEs can be very innovative in exercising corporate citizenship, without necessarily following the patterns of large multinational companies. The company studied engages as partner in some voluntary labor initiatives promoted by the government, employs people in marginal situations, and exerts influence for the adoption of good working conditions in its supply chain. Environmental issues and actions of solidarity are also considered within a global scope. Ethics of care and concern for specific aspects of the common good seem crucial as GCC drivers in this company, as do personal values, character, and leadership of the owner-manager of the firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

CEO:

Chief Executive Officer

GCC:

Global Corporate Citizenship

SMEs:

Small and medium size enterprises

ILO:

International labor organization

IEH:

Initiative for ethical trade

IW-Agreement:

Inclusive workplace agreement

References

  • Aguilera, R.V., D.E. Rupp, C.A. Williams and J. Ganapathi: 2007, ‹Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations ‹, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 836-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D.G. and N.E. Bowie: 2003, ‹Sweatshops and Respect for Persons ‹, Business Ethics Quarterly 13(2), 221-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T., K.Fujukawa and E.R. Gray: 2007, ‹The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identity: A Commentary on Corporate Identity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(1), 7-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besser, T.L.: 1999, ‹Community Involvement and the Perception of Success among Small Business Operators in Small Towns’, Journal of Small Business Management 37(4), 16-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., L.K. Treviño and D.A. Harrison: 2005, ‹Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97, 117-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B.K. and C.P. Dunn: 1996, ‹Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2), 133-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., M.A. Balzarova, C.J. Bamber and J.M. Sharp: 2004, ‹How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective’, Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 11(3), 140-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G.F., D.J. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1995, ‹Making Business Ethics Practical’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3), 399-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. and R. Esteban: 2007, ‹Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment’, Business Ethics: A European Review 16(1), 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1967, ‹Understanding The Social Responsibility Puzzle’, Business Horizons 10(4), 45-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston: 1995, ‹The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R., C. Walton and S. Fox: 1961, Conceptual foundations of business: an outline of major ideas sustaining business enterprise in the Western World (R.D. Irwin Homewood, Ill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G.: 2004, ‹Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises’, Business Ethics: A European Review 13(1), 50-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.L. and J.R. Schermerhorn Jr.: 2004, ‹Unleashing Individual Potential: Performance Gains Through Positive Organizational Behavior and Authentic Leadership’, Organizational Dynamics 33, 270-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.R. and K. Petropoulos: 2002, Tom’s of Maine (Loyola Marymount University Case Study, Los Angeles).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V.: 2006, The Ethics of Care (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and P. Watts: 2000, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense’ (The World Business Council for Sustainable Development). Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/DocRoot/IunSPdIKvmYH5HjbN4XC/csr2000.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2008.

  • Jenkins, H.: 2004, ‹A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective’, Journal of General Management 29(4), 37-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H.: 2006, ‹Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(3), 241-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B.: 2004 ‹Different relationships between perception of development performance appraisal and work performance’, Personnel Review 36(3), 378-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, G.: 2007 CSR and Competitiveness. European SME’s Good Practice. National Report Norway (Agder Research Publication, Kristiansand).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and O.C. Ferrell: 2004, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‹‹Implicit’ and ‹explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D. and J. Lozano: 2006, ‹SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their Own Words’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(3), 227-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., A. Russo and A. Tencati: 2007, ‹CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(3), 285-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. and K.P. Mikkelsen: 2007, Leading with Wisdom (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, S.: 1996, ‹The Kohlberg–Gilligan Controversy: Lessons for Account Ethics Education’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7, 33-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J.: 2007, ‹Corporate Directors and Social Responsibility: Ethics versus Shareholder Value’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(3), 319-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K.: 2008, ‹Global Corporate Citizenship’, Foreign Affairs 87(1), 107-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M., N. Taylor and K. Barker: 2004, ‹Environmental responsibility in SMEs: does it deliver competitive advantage?’. Business Strategy & the Environment 13(3), 156-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, C.R.: 1992, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.: 2000, Priorities, Practice and Ethics in Small Firms (The Institute of Business Ethics, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.: 2007, ‹CSR and Small Business in a European Policy Context: The Five “C”s of CSR and Small Business Research Agenda 2007’, Business & Society Review 112(4), 533-552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J. and R. Rutherfoord: 2003, ‹Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial’, Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), 1-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J. and R. Schmidpeter: 2003, ‹SMEs, Social Capital and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics 45(1/2), 93-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., R. Schmidpeter and A. Habisch: 2003, ‹Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the U.K.’ Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), 17-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D.J.: 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D.L.: 1995, ‹Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model ‹, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 43-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F.: 1999, ‹The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms’, Business Strategy & the Environment 8(4), 238-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F.: 2000, ‹Small firm environmental ethics: how deep do they go?’. Business Ethics: A European Review 9(1), 31-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K., M.E. Brown and L.P. Hartmann: 2003, ‹A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions From Inside and Outside the Executive Suite’, Human Relations 56, 5-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udayasankar, K.: 2008, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size ‹, Journal of Business Ethics 83(2), 167-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO: 2002, Corportae Social Responsibility: Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries (International Center of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A.C., D.R.Gilbert and R.H.Freeman: 1994, ‹A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 475-497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi von Weltzien Hoivik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Weltzien Hoivik, H., Melé, D. Can an SME Become a Global Corporate Citizen? Evidence from a Case Study. J Bus Ethics 88, 551–563 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0123-z

Key Words

Navigation