Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking on Commercial Scholarly Journals: Reflections on the ‘Open Access’ Movement

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the ‘open access’ movement in scholarly publishing, a movement of research librarians, scholars, research funding bodies and other stakeholders of the scholarly research process. Open access advocates argue that scholarly communities need to organize against the currently unworkable system whereby academics donate articles for free, yet have to buy them back at often exorbitant prices from journal publishers. In particular, they seek to replace subscription-based funding of journals with a range of alternatives that includes self-archiving and publication fees by researchers and their sponsors. The central claims of my study are twofold. The first is that the open access movement has indeed highlighted the need for the reform of scholarly publishing markets and practices. My second claim, however, is that certain proposals and models for reform are premised on over-optimistic views about disintermediation in scholarly communication as well as exaggerated assertions about the benefits of removing price barriers when larger issues about the system of ‘open science’ remain to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, K.M. (2001). Impact factors: Aiming at the wrong target, Cortex 37(4), 600-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • 030825.html}

    Google Scholar 

  • ARL (2003). Monographs and serial costs in ARL libraries, 1986-2002, ARL Statistics. Available: http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/graphs/2002/2002t2.html

  • Bergstrom, T. (2001). Free labor for costly journals? Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4), 183-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S.R. (2001). The rationale for 'full and open access' of scientific information. In S.R. Berry & A.S. Moffat (Eds.), The Transition from Paper: Where Are We Going and How Will We Get There? Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Available: http://www.amacad.org/publications/trans.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, H. (2000). Open science online, The American Prospect 11(10).

  • Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the Marketplace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D. (2003, June 13). Preserving the academic commons. Paper presented at the 89th Meeting of the American Association of University Professors, Washington, DC. Available:http://www.aaup.org/events/archived/2003/03Bollier.htm

  • Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). (2002). Budapest: George Soros Foundation. Available: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml

  • Case, M. (2000, March 22-24). Capitalizing on competition: The economic underpinnings of SPARC. Paper presented at the The Economics and Usage of Digital Library Collections, University of Michigan. Available: http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/case.pdf

  • Crawford, B.D. (2003). Open access publishing: Where is the value? The Lancet 362(9395), 1578-1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, H., Gass, A. & Kennison, R. (2004). Who pays for open access? PLoS Biology 2(4). Available: http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document& doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0020105

  • Frazier, K. (2001). The librarians' dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the 'big deal,' D-Lib Magazine 7(3). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier. html

  • Gannon, F. (2004). Ethical profits from publishing, EMBO Reports 5(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M. (2002). The economic crisis in libraries: Causes and effects. In R.E. Abel & L.W. Newlin (Eds.), Scholarly Publishing: Books, Journals, Publishers and Libraries in the Twentieth Century (pp. 257-271). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, L. (2004a). The promise and peril of 'open access', The Chronicle of Higher Education 50(21), p. A10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, L. (2004b). Scientific societies' publishing arms unite against open access movement, The Chronicle of Higher Education 50(29), p. A20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (2003a, December). Self-archive unto others as ye would have them self-archive unto you, University Affairs, p. 41.

  • Harnad, S. (2003b). Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution selfarchiving: Maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. In D. Law & J. Andrews (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Policy, Planning and Practice. Ashgate Publishing. Available: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Eharnad/Temp/digital-libraries.htm

  • Harnad, S. (2003c). Mandated online RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: Improving the UK research assessment exercise whils making it cheaper and easier, Ariadne 35. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/

  • Henderson, A. (2002). Diversity and the growth of serious/scholarly/scientific journals. InR.E. Abel & L.W. Newlin (Eds.), Scholarly Publishing: Books, Journals, Publishers and Libraries in the Twentieth Century (pp. 133-162). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongejan, A. (2003, Autumn). Commerce and research: Why commercial publishers are good for research. Research Information. Available: http://www. researchinformation.info/riaut03elsevier.html

  • 12/kelty/}

  • Kling, R. & Meyer, E.T. (2002). Levelling the playing field or expanding the bleachers?: Socio-technical interaction systems and arXiv, Center for Social Informatics Working Paper. Available: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/WP/WP02-10B.html

  • Kyrillidou, M. & Young, M. (2003). ARL Statistics 2001-02: Research Library Trends. Association of Research Libraries. Available: http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/ 02pub/intro02.html

  • McCabe, M. (2002). Journal pricing and mergers: A portfolio approach, American Economic Review 92(1), 259-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2004). Open access ignoring lessons of dot-com bubble, Nature Web Focus. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/15.html

  • MLA (2002). The future of scholarly publishing, Profession, 172-186. Available: http://www.mla.org/issues_scholarly_pub

  • Morris, S. (2003). Open publishing, Learned Publishing 16, 171-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. (2004). Open access and not-for-profit publishers, Nature Web Focus. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/2.html

  • Office of Fair Trading. (2002). The Market for Scientific, Technical and Medical Journals: UK Office of Fair Trading. Available: http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/A56C7602-C0BD-428D-BED2-36784363243B/0/oft396.pdf

  • Okerson, A. (2003). Towards a vision of inexpensive scholarly journal publication, Libri 53. Available: http://www.library.yale.edu/∼okerson/Libri.html

  • Owens, S.R. (2003). Revolution or evolution?: A shift to an open access model of publishing would clearly benefit science, but who should pay? EMBO Reports 4(8), 741-743.

    Google Scholar 

  • wings.html}

  • Spendlove, P. (2004, November). The future of research: A popular initiative is changing how scholars-and libraries-work, Quill & Quire, 16-17.

  • Suber, P. (2003). Open Access to Science and Scholarship. Geneva: World Summit on the Information Society. Available: http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/writing/wsis.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Suber, P. (2004, February 7). Open access in the humanities, SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Available: http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/newsletter/02-02-04. htm#humanities

  • Velterop, J. (2003). Should scholarly societies embrace open access (or is it the kiss of death)? Learned Publishing 16, 167-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • 7445.pdf}

    Google Scholar 

  • 11/willinsky/index.html}

  • Willinsky, J. (2003a). Scholarly associations and the economic viability of open access publishing, Journal of Digital Information 4(2).

  • Willinsky, J. (2003b). Nine flavors of open access publishing, Postgraduate Journal of Medicine 49(3), 263-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandonella, C. (2003a, June 27). Open access law introduced, The Scientist. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030627/04

  • Zandonella, C. (2003b, July 16). Sabo bill assessed, The Scientist. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030716/04/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Social Science, York University, 12 Melville Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6G 1Y2, Canada

    Richard Wellen

Authors
  1. Richard Wellen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wellen, R. Taking on Commercial Scholarly Journals: Reflections on the ‘Open Access’ Movement. Journal of Academic Ethics 2, 101–118 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039010.14325.3d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039010.14325.3d

Search

Navigation