Abstract
Although many of the issues surrounding innateness have received a good deal of attention lately, the basic concept of token innateness has been largely ignored. In the present paper, I try to correct this imbalance by offering an account of the innateness of token traits. I begin by explaining Stephen Stich's account of token innateness and offering a counterexample to that account. I then clarify why the contemporary biological approaches to innateness will not be able to resolve the problems that beset Stich's account. From there, I develop an alternative understanding of the innateness of token traits, what I call a ‘causal/explanatory’ account. The argument to be made is that token innateness is both a causal, and an explanatory, concept. After clarifying this understanding of innateness, and showing how it handles several counterexamples to other accounts, I end with some comments on what the causal/explanatory account suggests for our understanding of innateness in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, Samuel: 1991, Medical Microbiology, Churchill Livingston, New York, N.Y., 3rd edition.
Black's Law Dicitonary, West publishing, St. Paul, 1990, 6th edition, p. 1032.
Block, N. and Dworkin, R.: 1976, The I.Q. Controversy, Random House, New York, N.Y., p. 474.
Falconer, D.S.: 1989, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Wiley, NY, N.Y., 3rd edition.
Feinberg, J. 1970, Doing and Deserving, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Futuyma, D.: 1986, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., p. 54.
Grant, V.: 1981, Plant Speciation, Columbia University Press, N.Y., N.Y., 2nd edition.
Gifford, F.: 1990, ‘Genetic Traits’, Biology and Philosophy 5, 327–347.
Hart, H.L.A. and Honore, Tony: 1985. Causation in the Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Kelley, Patrick: ‘Proximate Cause in Negligence Law,’ Washington University Law Quarterly 69, 50–51.
Prosser and Keeton: Handbook of the Law of Torts, 5th edition, pp. 265–279.
Stich, S.: 1975, Innate Ideas, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wendler, D. Innateness as an explanatory concept. Biol Philos 11, 89–116 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127473
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127473