Abstract
I consider two threats to the idea that on-line intelligent behaviour (the production offluid and adaptable responses to ongoing sensory input) must or should be explainedby appeal to neurally located representations. The first of these threats occurs whenextra-neural factors account for the kind of behavioural richness and flexibility normallyassociated with representation-based control. I show how this anti-representationalchallenge can be met, if we apply the thought that, to be a representational system,an action-oriented neural system must not only be the source of at least some of theobserved behavioural richness and flexibility, it must also feature two architecturaltraits, namely arbitrariness and homuncularity. Unfortunately, however, this solutionopens the door to our second threat to representation. The homuncularity conditionwill not be met by any system in which the causal contribution of each component ismassively context-sensitive and variable over time. I end by discussing the empiricalbet that biological nervous systems will not exhibit this style of causation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Beer, R. D.: 1995, Computational and Dynamical Languages for Autonomous Agents, in Port and van Gelder, pp. 121-147.
Brooks, R. A.: 1991, ‘Intelligence without Representation’, Artificial Intelligence 47, 139-159.
Clark, A.: 1997, Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.
Cliff, D., P. Husbands, J.-A. Meyer and S. Wilson (eds): 1994, From Animals to Animats 3: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.
Dennett, D.: 1978, Brainstorms, Harvester Press, Brighton.
Franceschini, N., J. M. Pichon and C. Blanes: 1992, ‘From Insect Vision to Robot Vision’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, series B, 337, 283-294.
Gibson, J. J.: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Globus, G.: 1992, ‘Towards a Non-Computational Cognitive Neuroscience’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 299-310.
Harvey, I.: 1992, Untimed and Misrepresented: Connectionism and the Computer Metaphor. Cognitive Science Research Paper 245, University of Sussex. Reprinted in AISB Quarterly 96, 20-27, 1996.
Harvey, I., P. Husbands and D. Cliff: 1994, ‘Seeing the Light: Artificial Evolution, Real Vision’, in Cliff, Husbands, Meyer and Wilson, pp. 392-401.
Hendriks-Jansen, H.: 1996, Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.
Husbands, P., I. Harvey and D. Cliff: 1995, ‘Circle in the Round: State Space Attractors for Evolved Sighted Robots’, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 15, 83-106.
Husbands, P. and J.-A. Meyer (eds): 1998, Evolutionary Robotics: Proceedings of the First European Workshop, EvoRobot98, Vol. 1468 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin.
Kelso, J. A. S.: 1995, Dynamic Patterns, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.
Millikan, R.: 1995, White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.
Moran, F., A. Moreno, J. Merelo and P. Chacon (eds.): 1995, Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Artificial Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.
Port, R. and T. van Gelder: 1995, Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.
Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1986, Computation and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Shanon, B.: 1993, The Representational and the Presentational: An Essay on Cognition and the Study of Mind, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York and London.
Sterelny, K.: 1990, The Representational Theory of Mind: An Introduction, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England and Cambridge, MA.
Thelen, E. and L. B. Smith: 1993, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Thompson, A.: 1995, ‘Evolving Electronic Robot Controllers that Exploit Hardware Resources’, in Moran, Moreno, Merelo, and Chacon, pp. 641-657.
van Gelder, T.: 1991, ‘Connectionism and Dynamical Explanation’, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 499-503.
van Gelder, T.: 1995, ‘What Might Cognition Be If Not Computation?’, Journal of Philosophy XCII(7), 345-381.
Webb, B.: 1994, ‘Robotic Experiments in Cricket Phonotaxis’, in Cliff et al., pp. 45-54.
Wheeler, M.: 1994, ‘From Activation to Activity: Representation, Computation, and the Dynamics of Neural Network Control Systems’, Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour Quarterly 87, 36-42.
Wheeler, M.: 1998, ‘Explaining the Evolved: Homunculi, Modules, and Internal Representation’, in Husbands and Meyer, pp. 87-107.
Wheeler, M. and A. Clark: 1999, ‘Genic Representation: Reconciling Content and Causal Complexity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50(1), 103-135.
Wimsatt, W.: 1986, ‘Forms of Aggregativity’, in A. Donagan, N. Perovich and M. Wedin (eds), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 259-293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wheeler, M. Two Threats To Representation. Synthese 129, 211–231 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013055424231
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013055424231